Says who? NVidia? Sounds like marketing guff to me.
Were the cards really "incorrectly boosting too high" or was that how they were designed to boost and they've nerfed the speeds a bit due to the crashing problems?
Sounds very fishy to me to suggest that NVidia just happened to make a mistake with their drivers that caused the cards to boost too high at the exact same time that there was this variation in capacitor implementation by the AIBs which exacerbated the problem.
why does it have to be either of them . To me persoanlly drivers and bios problems are present in every launch. But the 3080 is a whole new gpu from architecture and a whole new process node nvidia never used before. When reports was coming in about all cards crash to desktop and act ina. Similar behaviour from FE to ASU’s to msi to zotac
the only things they all share is gpu memory and driver’s everything else else is down to there own custom parts and designs.
No one on here if it was for YouTube would be looking at caps etc the gpu is hitting its limit and down to silicon lottery again.
But the story is already out people will think and believe what they like.
The funny part of it is if it was amd it would have been put down to crappy drivers again. Not like nvidia drivers have been good the last 2 years is it