• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA ‘Ampere’ 8nm Graphics Cards

Is there any chance or roadmap for DLSS to be applied to old games?

The potential for DLSS for me is clearly in a gaming laptop.

Imagine being able to pack an RTX 3060 and know you can DLSS a 540p image to 1080p and it look more than good enough for portable gameplay. It'll turn portable gaming laptops into very usable machines for most games.

I think DLSS is amazing but if its not available in most games we play.. its just a bit of a joke.
 
ES1eBPxUEAIEyGl
Man, that is not enough RAM ffs. They need to be going 12 for 3070 and 3080, 16 for 3080Ti and 24 for Titan.
 
Man, that is not enough RAM ffs. They need to be going 12 for 3070 and 3080, 16 for 3080Ti and 24 for Titan.

Oh I'm sure Titan's gonna pack lots of vram for the modest sum of $2499 again.

I guess at least in that respect vram might still be an ace for AMD if they do decide to go with HBM. Otherwise, yeah, it's gonna be sad all around.
 
Nvidia have to have high prices so they can plough all those profits into thier car tech crap.

Before long i bet they wont even make competative cards for joe public.
 
Man, that is not enough RAM ffs. They need to be going 12 for 3070 and 3080, 16 for 3080Ti and 24 for Titan.
They don't. Better compression and Nvidia starting to leverage other means of paging data means they don't need to add more and more VRAM each generation. We're starting to be at a point where off-card storage has the bandwidth available to be a usable resource for GPU loading.
 
Nvidia have to have high prices so they can plough all those profits into thier car tech crap.

Before long i bet they wont even make competative cards for joe public.
They cant do that AMD is not THAT far behind. Unless they get together into a nice and cozy price fixing scheme.
 
They don't. Better compression and Nvidia starting to leverage other means of paging data means they don't need to add more and more VRAM each generation. We're starting to be at a point where off-card storage has the bandwidth available to be a usable resource for GPU loading.
Yea, I ain’t convinced about that just yet. Will believe it once I see it. A bit like AMD and their 4GB HBM Fury...
 
Yea, I ain’t convinced about that just yet. Will believe it once I see it. A bit like AMD and their 4GB HBM Fury...
A lot, at least from viewpoint, has changed in the storage space in 4-5 years. Better technology becoming quickly adopted by the masses (relatively speaking...) opens up a lot of potential for shared resources.
 
A lot, at least from viewpoint, has changed in the storage space in 4-5 years. Better technology becoming quickly adopted by the masses (relatively speaking...) opens up a lot of potential for shared resources.
Sure. But I still say we’ll see.

Unless it works perfectly I would just rather the extra 4GB of ram, not like that would add a huge amount to the cost of the card in the end.
 
They don't. Better compression and Nvidia starting to leverage other means of paging data means they don't need to add more and more VRAM each generation. We're starting to be at a point where off-card storage has the bandwidth available to be a usable resource for GPU loading.

Compression helps with bandwidth, but it can't substitute for vram amount requirements. As for other paging means, maybe ask Vega owners how (HBCC) that panned out.

As most of us find out, there's simply no substitute for bigger... vram amounts. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom