• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia bans overclocking for its G80

Hi there

Yes its correct for initial launch all cards will operate at stock speeds. It possible when stock is not in allocation then some partners may do some overclocking, it all depends on how strictly NVIDIA will force this into place.
 
That article says Nvidia don't want another 7900 GT fiasco, what fiasco is this then, everyone keeps saying theres nothing wrong with em, so why are Nvida saying they faulty then. :confused: :p

Wonder if they clock at all then the 8800's, wonder how many threads we'll get of 'clocked my 8800, now borked'. :D
 
Last edited:
wait a minute, you saying that just the stock clocks from all manufacturers will be the same but the actual overclocking of the card via coolbits or whatever will still be allowed? i thought the card would have hardware locked clocks.
 
The vertex units were OCed a little too much by many OEMs, causing stuttering, and eventually death of graphics cards. NV just want OEMs to use stock clocks. Nothing stopping the end-user overclocking the GPU though.
 
I'd be surprised if Nvidia could prevent overclocking by the end user. I assume that they mean that they will not permit their partners to release factory overclocked versions.

Ginga
 
Yes end user can overclock em, but are they saying they cant be overclocked at all as they will bork or what, i would'nt risk clocking a one, not if ive shelled out £500+ thats for sure. :p
 
If it's simply a case of Nvidia not letting any of the card makers pre-overclock cards then I can't see a problem with that as I think pre-overclocked cards aren't worth the extra price of a stock clocked card anyway. Just overclock it yourself innit bruv. :D
 
its crazy because vendors didnt overclock the cards that much over stock, and if that's the real reason they were failing then i'm sorry but obviously nvidia were running the cores right on the edge from the start. how can a few mhz over stock be the difference between a working card and a dead card?


from the point of view of keeping things simple..that i can understand. there are so many difference modls and speeds of nvidia cards it that it can be very confusing for the customer.
 
Boogle said:
The vertex units were OCed a little too much by many OEMs, causing stuttering, and eventually death of graphics cards. NV just want OEMs to use stock clocks. Nothing stopping the end-user overclocking the GPU though.

Still dont think it was a core issue, more a memory problem.

The one bonus to this is that the cost of the cards should remain fairly low. Does kinda make getting a better clocking card more "luck of the draw" as there may not be as much/any binning going on.
 
techmonkey said:
If it's simply a case of Nvidia not letting any of the card makers pre-overclock cards then I can't see a problem with that as I think pre-overclocked cards aren't worth the extra price of a stock clocked card anyway. Just overclock it yourself innit bruv. :D

Yes, but are they stopping vendors from overclocking them for a reason, thats what everyone wants to know, as as i said what if theres a mass of borked G80 threads due to overlocking, and then Nvidia just say well why do you think we banned vendors from overclokinng them.
 
this is actually a good idea on NVIDIAs part, there playing it safe, not letting card makers overclock the GPU means the failure rate will be low, then if the buyer wants to overclock it'll be their problem if it dies, not NVIDIAs :p
 
Gashman said:
this is actually a good idea on NVIDIAs part, there playing it safe, not letting card makers overclock the GPU means the failure rate will be low, then if the buyer wants to overclock it'll be their problem if it dies, not NVIDIAs :p

Exactly, as the article says they don't want another 7900 GT fiasco, so to me they are saying, if you the consumer attempts overclocking of em, then the risk of borkness is highly likely. :)
 
Another possibility (although a remote one) is that NV arent confident enough in their new chips to allow users to oc them :p I mean, if a load of people started overclocking their cards, and then the majority of the cards died....NV would have a destroyed reputation.....But if they warn people first that these cards are considerably more fragile than previous cards, then people wont push them as hard. However, like I said, I dont think its a solid possibility, just speculation :p
 
Plus i cant see the vendors not getting a bit suss if all of a sudden the get G80s returned on mass as they are borking left right and centre, they'll be sitting there saying 'hang on a minute, they are fine at stock, so why are they being returned on mass borked, somethings not right here'. :D

I can see a load of problems ahead for ppl trying to get RMA's, if they start getting returned on mass.
 
Last edited:
Cyber-Mav said:
doubt something like the next gen cards will need to be overclocked anyways. other than for benchmarking.
It does seem odd that a top of the range next gen card that will be aimed at the enthusiast market cant be clocked without it going fizzle.
 
pegasus1 said:
It does seem odd that a top of the range next gen card that will be aimed at the enthusiast market cant be clocked without it going fizzle.

Hmm first thing I might do is remove the gunk and put some AS5 on the card, hopefully help with any temp issues. :)

On a general note, I don't overclock my graphics cards at all until I start to notice it struggling with games. By that point I've usually had the card for 6+ months and so I'm not too worried about it going pop. I never overclock as soon as I get a new card for some unknown reason... too scared probably. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom