• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia GTC16 Webcast Live Stream@5pm/9am PDT *Jen looks great in leather.*

bru

bru

Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
7,359
Location
kent
Those clock speeds are pretty high for a Tesla part, I mean the P100 base clock is higher than the kingpins boost clock :eek: for a non consumer part that is ridiculous.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,988
Location
Planet Earth
Intel compute card could change everything. Nvidia need to keep happy the very people that have keep them in business for so long "The PC Gamer"

The profit margins are quite high in that area though - they are a significant contribution to the companies bottom line and what makes it economically to build some large GPUs in the first place.

We would never have had the GK110 based cards in 2012 or 2013 IMHO if Nvidia could not sell them in the commercial markets.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
92,161
I don't think the Drive stuff is in production either. The card in the glass case had unmarked heatsinks with Tegra decals on them, to prevent identification of what it was (prior showing was quickly identified as Maxwell, despite them claiming it to be Pascal). Almost certainly means they still don't have Drive PX2 test chips, even if it is going to be the first Pascal product to reach production.

With nVidia that doesn't really mean much - they've done major shows before with just slides and/or mock ups and then released a new line up shortly after.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2010
Posts
8,320
Location
Leeds
There is a decent amount of information on the Pascal architecture from the link someone put up earlier. They've given shaders per SM, number of SMs and some fairly detailed numbers, number of registers, number of threads, clock speeds/performance for GP100. Assuming that Pascal is the same up and down the range in base design then that is a lot of Pascal architecture info. It's heavily FP64/FP16 performance increase focused and FP32 performance increase is pretty painfully low.

https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/inside-pascal/
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,988
Location
Planet Earth
Someone on AT forums made this observation:

In that respect Pascal is more closer to GCN the ever in terms of on chip memory resources and occupancy and it even has 64K of shared mem per SM (64 wide) just like GCN CU (64 wide) having 64K of shared mem! (The same ALU/shared mem ratio!)

GCN and Pascal might be more a like than we think!!
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
92,161
It's heavily FP64/FP16 performance increase focused and FP32 performance increase is pretty painfully low.

FP32 isn't that bad - sure the hardware units hasn't gone up much but the clock speeds are a fair jump - the actual GFLOP increase isn't to be sniffed at.

The CUDA core per SM is an interesting change for those who've been keeping up ;)
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2010
Posts
8,320
Location
Leeds
Jen looks good in leather, that's all that there is to know.

He actually looked very nervous, made a good few mistakes and even at one stage looked very annoyed. Clearly something not right. Was not his greatest presentation but then again all they had to show was slides and a render and a $130k box of promises.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
92,161
He actually looked very nervous, made a good few mistakes and even at one stage looked very annoyed. Clearly something not right. Was not his greatest presentation but then again all they had to show was slides and a render and a $130k box of promises.

The number of times he repeated/started to repeat himself caught my attention - something clearly not right but might be personal not business.
 
Back
Top Bottom