• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia GTX 280 - IN STOCK NOW!!!

I know what you are saying but I beleive the $349 price tag which as you say, if the 4870x2 had been released same day, then it would have had to have been almost $700.

Still can't see them dropping the price of the 4870 to $250 within 6 weeks although perhaps not beyond the realm of imagination. They could sell a lot of cards in 6 weeks at $350 and then drop the price on 4870x2 launch. That would then mean they could release the 4870x2 for $499 and keep their promise.

On the other hand, promises are one thing but what happens if you make a chip way faster than expected? Say ATI managed to make a gpu which was twice as fast as GTX280. Do you seriously expect them to keep to the promise of $499 if the opposition was selling a slower chip for $649?

I know that's an unlikely scenario but that is the risk when you make wide sweeping statements like "we well never sell a graphics card for more than $499".

Personally, if they had a GPU on their hands that was twice as fast as GT200, they would do one of two things:

1. Use it for their next-next gen.

2. Price it rather cheaply as it still cost them little to make anyway just to 'humiliate' NV's latest offering to get back for all the smack talk.
 
I actually agree with the above.

1 buggy game does not count at 1920's, I will keep playing at 1920x1440 and drop to 1600x1200 if needed in future games as this new card is a rehash and I can skip it completely.

Lets see if the new Die Shrunk version later can have DX10.1 (doubt it) and be any better and worth the upgrade for me esp as price is a bit high for a rehash.

The GTX/Ultra simply were very good cards and have had a long run at the top. (still have I suppose).


Are you still using a CRT?
 
I am never spending over £150 on a gpu ever again just not worth it with so few games requiring much more than an 8800gt these days or on the horizon can see my gt lasting until well in to next year.
It's just not worth the loss you incur so fast, whos to say these 280 wont be only £200 second hand in a matter of months.
Hopefully gone are the days of having to spend £400 to get max details on new games.
 
Last edited:
Got to love how nvidia believe anyone will pay 560 pounds to play one unoptimized, overrated game, Overclockers too for that matter.
 
I nearly pooped myself when i saw the price.

Great components no doubt but i dont see how anyone except extreme enthusiasts can justify the price / performance ratio
 
Well we all should be pleased ATI is still in the game, otherwise threads like this would not evoke so much feeling as we would all be paying this sort of money for Cards !
I wish ATI well with their new card and hope it makes some money for them.
 
O.k Ive had my 8800GTX since the day after release day, I'm now in the market for a new GPU.
I wanted to hold off for the GTX280 and have £400 to spend. Is there any reason I shouldnt go for the cheaper 9800GX2 instead, I've looked at the benchmarks while the GTX280 is always faster, sometimes it isnt by much, I have the money but should I bother spending it all?

This will be going in with a [email protected], 4GB PC8500, Asus Rampage X48 MB. I'm an NV fanboy btw so no ATI's (soz).
 
O.k Ive had my 8800GTX since the day after release day, I'm now in the market for a new GPU.
I wanted to hold off for the GTX280 and have £400 to spend. Is there any reason I shouldnt go for the cheaper 9800GX2 instead, I've looked at the benchmarks while the GTX280 is always faster, sometimes it isnt by much, I have the money but should I bother spending it all?

This will be going in with a [email protected], 4GB PC8500, Asus Rampage X48 MB. I'm an NV fanboy btw so no ATI's (soz).

Lol, if you're such a DIRTY fanboy:mad:, then you should go for Nvidias latest and greatest - the GTX280
 
O.k Ive had my 8800GTX since the day after release day, I'm now in the market for a new GPU.
I wanted to hold off for the GTX280 and have £400 to spend. Is there any reason I shouldnt go for the cheaper 9800GX2 instead, I've looked at the benchmarks while the GTX280 is always faster, sometimes it isnt by much, I have the money but should I bother spending it all?

This will be going in with a [email protected], 4GB PC8500, Asus Rampage X48 MB. I'm an NV fanboy btw so no ATI's (soz).

There is no reason you cant continue to run your GTX if you game at 1920's or lower avoiding 1 badly coded game and a few bad console ports at that Res+AA+AF.

These cards appear more a rehash than new Tech esp no DX10.1.
 
image035.png


Nuff said. XD
 
This sort of pricing (And this is not a dig at OcUK - I'm sure your prices are competitive) is BAD for PC Gaming.

When the graphics card ALONE that gets the best out of modern cames is more than £500, something is wrong.

It's like a whole line of cards designed for people who live at home, have no rent, but have a full time job and have yet to discover cars as a way of burning income :D
 
Why do people insist Crysis is badly coded. Its an incredibly detailed game looking better than anything by a distance, and as such it runs at a slower fps than other games that don't look as good, thats no different to every other game. People, some specifically, got caught up in the whole "optimised for quad core" crap the guys behind it said in the hype to release. Every single game maker hypes up ANY feature the game can use no matter if it needs it or not. IT will infact use all cores, most games can be load-spread across all cores now, this is all you need to claim that its optimised for quad cores by running a few different threads. Anything you buy has people overhype everything it can do. Games like Crysis don't, and wouldn't use 100% cpu load on all 4 cores, why would it need to, it doesn't make it badly optimised, it would be badly optimised if it did use 100% of all 4 cores.

Saying all that, its not the best game ever, but frankly who cares either way. How many people play a game and play it over and over and over until the next hardest on hardware game comes around. We've mostly all played it, and won't play it again so soon so its irrelevant.

Its a more powerful card no doubt, but very very few people will see any of that new power. If you get 80fps in a game with a 9800gtx, and this gets 125fps, or 300fps, your game experience is unlikely to change in the slightest. However despite all that, do expect in the next year, maybe 18 months, that PC gaming will make fairly large strides forward. Consoles get released, become the focal point and PC's get a lot of ports with little extra in the way of options so not much power needed. But after 18months, to 2 years, game dev's start to shift back towards PC's as the graphical hardware shifts significantly in the PC favour. But why waste £500 now, when you can buy the same card if you want, in 6 months for half the price(maybe less depending on sales and 55nm shift) when the games that need it start to appear.


If anyone had any balls, they would COMPLETELY boycot the high end Nvidia cards, only buy ATi £150-250 cards and watch as game dev's hopefully ditch their TWIMTBP program, which would almost certainly see a significant drop in Nvidia's lead in performance, which would hopefully cause them to move to a new architechture and compete with ATi on price and tech, over paying off dev's.

I just can't stand Nvidia's business practice anymore, pay off dev's to optimise for them, price fixing, overcharging, lots of bullpap PR stunts, this latest crap of "cpu isn't important, Intel are scared, we're taking over" i mean, wtf. Half of their business practice seems to me, to reek of anti-competition law breaking attempts to keep ATi down.
 
Back
Top Bottom