God I love this place sometimesThey are included to take away the sour taste left over after overpaying for your GPU.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf403/cf403fd9d74fcb9787855d218f4b5df4589edfb3" alt="Cry laughing :cry: :cry:"
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
God I love this place sometimesThey are included to take away the sour taste left over after overpaying for your GPU.
Yeah. I know, well, I'm not sure.If you're planning to waterblock, but are having buyers remorse at 2.5k, and will look to buy a high tier model which right now is almost certain to be overpriced. Wouldn't it make sense to wait until you can get it at 2150. The only real reason to buy the top sku's is they run quieter and looks. If you're watercooling these factors are redundant.
Forgive me if I'm wrong but don't PNY manufacturer all or most of Nvidia's quadro cards?
I had an old gainward phantom years ago, think it was a gtx 470 or 570 if I recall correctly. Good build quality but very loud.
Got my first Palit on pre-order as we speak so will see what that is like when it arrives
Tbh I think where the ‘5090 difference’ is most relevant is in the lower FPS regions. Going from ~60 -> ~80fps, or even ~90 -> 120fps is a big quality of life boost. You have legroom to apply a subtle FPS cap and keep things smooth (above ‘treacle pace’).
Or, for the pixel peepers, it allows you to run native rather than using upscaling.
Are these thing material when your already pushing 140fps with a 4090? Probably not, no.
The ‘absolute night and day difference ’ FPS changes are (IMO):
30fps -> 60fps
60fps -> 120fps (although 90fps is still a gamechanger IMO)
120fps -> 240fps (ditto 180fps = gamechanger)
And so on.
My worry is that f te chip is defective enough to be missing ROPS you just do not know what else might be wrong. I did think about autioning it off with full transparency re the ROPS but that just seems wrong to me, couldnt nring myself to do itIf you got a partial refund with option of keeping the card, and now the new cards landing are £800 more than the price you paid, I'd just take the partial refund and be done with it...the difference in performance is not massive..the 5090 is still way faster than anything else, with the slight rops drop. Alternatively, as new cards are £800 more, you could probably sell it for what you paid for it, keeping the refund difference for yourself. If there's a choice of buying the card for £3300 with full ROP or £2500 with 8 rops missing, think someone will take the plunge. It'll probably be a collectors item years down the line
I mean, ideally they just replace your card at zero cost difference, but if that's off the table, the above is probably best bet if you don't want to keep the card
Yeah, that would be exactly my worry with a card with missing ROPS. We don't actually know how a major manufacturing screw-up has happened and Nvidia have not been overflowing with transparency. Who's to say what else might turn out to be wrong with those cards over time.My worry is that f te chip is defective enough to be missing ROPS you just do not know what else might be wrong. I did think about autioning it off with full transparency re the ROPS but that just seems wrong to me, couldnt nring myself to do it