• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA RTX 50 SERIES - Technical/General Discussion

Is it bad that I've paid for an autobuy app thing for the rtx 5090. It only does one retailer and it's very limited in functionality, ie can't select specific cards, you just put a maximum price.

Even with this autobuy thing it's difficult to get one.
It’s like Kinder Surprise back in the day. Never know what you’ll get in that damn egg.
 
Despite being a big feature for RTX5000, RTX Mega Geometry actually benefits older hardware much more than new.

A 9800x3d paired with a 5080 or 5090 sees basically no performance increases with Mega Geometry. But pair a 3600 and a 2080ti and you see 15% higher framerate than before. This higher framerate applies when pairing a strong cpu with a weak GPU but especially applies with a weak CPU, the weaker the CPU the higher the frame rate increases from having mega geometry on

So overall despite Nvidia saying Mega Geometry runs best on RTX5000, it looks like gamers with older CPus and GPus will see the real benefit




Yes I was wondering if it's only beneficial if you are close to the VRAM limit, maybe it will be a better feature for the 5070. Perhaps it will only help the 5080 in games like Indiana Jones but it would be difficult to compare that to a card from the 3000 series.

Edit- The 3000 series is getting lots of good gains this generation!
 
Last edited:
Despite being a big feature for RTX5000, RTX Mega Geometry actually benefits older hardware much more than new.

A 9800x3d paired with a 5080 or 5090 sees basically no performance increases with Mega Geometry. But pair a 3600 and a 2080ti and you see 15% higher framerate than before. This higher framerate applies when pairing a strong cpu with a weak GPU but especially applies with a weak CPU, the weaker the CPU the higher the frame rate increases from having mega geometry on

So overall despite Nvidia saying Mega Geometry runs best on RTX5000, it looks like gamers with older CPus and GPus will see the real benefit





very interesting, seems to have basically no downsides. Wonder how hard it is to do for the developers or if it will just become standard going forward.
 

Definitely some crack being done on the daily at asus.
 

Definitely some crack being done on the daily at asus.
everyone hates on the gamerock for being ugly but even that card doesn't come close to how ugly this card is. Instead of offering garish finishes how about fixing that 4th fan and the coil whine?
 
Last edited:

Definitely some crack being done on the daily at asus.


It's the 5090 Astral RAGE

RAGE = Rich Arab Gold Edition

 
Last edited:
Despite being a big feature for RTX5000, RTX Mega Geometry actually benefits older hardware much more than new.

A 9800x3d paired with a 5080 or 5090 sees basically no performance increases with Mega Geometry. But pair a 3600 and a 2080ti and you see 15% higher framerate than before. This higher framerate applies when pairing a strong cpu with a weak GPU but especially applies with a weak CPU, the weaker the CPU the higher the frame rate increases from having mega geometry on

So overall despite Nvidia saying Mega Geometry runs best on RTX5000, it looks like gamers with older CPus and GPus will see the real benefit




I seen 10-30% more FPS in select games once I installed the 9800X3D, paried with 7900XTX. Playing in 5120x1440 240Hz G9 monitor.
 
everyone hates on the gamerock for being ugly but even that card doesn't come close to how ugly this card is. Instead of offering garish finishes how about fixing that 4th fan and the coil whine?
Asus has been targeting gimmick and flashy features instead of function for past 8 years or so.
 
The laws of thermodynamics are immutable. 650w TDP needs a hefty HS.

How about an AIB add a peltier cooler to one of their models (remember those?) We're already in the domain of ridiculous energy usage for these cards, might as well go whole hog.

although you are correct, but I also don't think we need almost 3kg of Heatsink, the only thing NVidia did right this round was the design of the 5090 FE, very efficient cooling for its size although running somewhat hot it functions within thermal tolerance of the components. We don't need these 4 slot cooler GPU that look like breeze blocks. I agree if TDP keeps rising like this they just cant keep on making heatsink on the gpu bigger and bigger, Peltier might be an answer but they also have drawbacks.
 
Has anyone tried downclocking the VRAM yet and seeing what difference it makes to performance and power usage? I recall a brief comment from one review saying it overclocked by a huge amount (core OCd as well though) but the difference was barely noticable so I'm wondering just how necessary GDDR7 actually is.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom