Good job they be cheap as chips then.
Yes
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Good job they be cheap as chips then.
[email protected] on an old Asus X58 P6T Mem@1758Mhz DDR3
http://i64.tinypiG][/QUOTE]
Stuck at 220mhz.? Won't it go higher on the multi? If the actual voltage was only 1.385 you could go higher. :D
It might do but I just arbitrarily thought I'd see how far it could go on 1.39v, plus temps are nice and manageable. I'm still getting to grips with this ancient X58 stuff.Stuck at 220mhz.? Won't it go higher on the multi? If the actual voltage was only 1.385 you could go higher.
yes, it is much more fun to tweak and mess around with than newer stuff, but it does take a bit of getting used to. i really like x58.It might do but I just arbitrarily thought I'd see how far it could go on 1.39v, plus temps are nice and manageable. I'm still getting to grips with this ancient X58 stuff.
Great score for a 2500k though you should have run the single core bench as well as this is where it would shine.bought off the forum here. a bit better than my last one
I was going to do that but I have bought another one from America that does 5.7ghz so I might not bother benchmarking this one any further.Great score for a 2500k though you should have run the single core bench as well as this is where it would shine.
you got the number the wrong way round its suppose to be 5.4ghz not 4.5ghz even though it was nearer 4.6ghzA rather more conservative overclock than the last few posts.
that is a shame. i did the 2500K run on air, but they run super cool and they are solderedMy £20 cooler says NO!