• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OcUK Cinebench R15 benchmark thread

1gdfs.jpg


Yes, I was listening to music, and updating malwarebytes at the same time.

My uncore is at 3.8ghz. CPU at 4.6ghz. This is my 24/7 OC.

Memory Kingston HyperX black @ 1600mhz, 9-10-10-something.

I can do a proper bench score later, but I do like how that single thread score looks like, even when doing a ton of crap at the same time.

Also shows how uncore has very little effect.
 
Cinebench.png


Why is CPUZ reading the PLL AGAIN?

Top of the single threaded and i5's (Until someone comes and beats me)

That's at 4.75GHZ.
My chip just couldn't do 5GHZ, I'd need to put like 1.525v in to do that.
 
Last edited:
Why is CPUZ reading the PLL AGAIN?

Top of the single threaded and i5's (Until someone comes and beats me)

Could you post your full system specs? (The relevant ones).

I know you have a similar setup, but I'd like to compare so I know what makes the difference.

Thanks.
 
@OP

Please record this score in the original post aswell. This will give a better idea for those of us still on Core2Quad about relative performance comparison to today's top dogs :)

Q9650@4Ghz
8GB DDR2@1068MHz
7950 1000/1250Mhz
However the test results seem somewhat unpredictable. First time I ran the test, I got 101cb in single threaded performance. 2nd time it increased to 112cb lol. My multithreaded stayed the same at 441cb although MP ratio decreased to 3.94x 2nd time from 4.83 first time. OpenGL score improved to 78.94fps from 63.45fps first time. Looking at the results it is clear that going from Q9650@4Ghz to [email protected] easily gives twice the performance!!


Q9650CBR15bench_zpsa5750a58.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom