*** OcUK Crysis DX9 TopList ***

[darren.head]

14.975fps
darren.head
e6400@stock 2.13ghz
x1900xt 512@stock 621/720
XP SP2 32Bit
OOps...speedstep enabled

 

[Dharok]

34.35 fps
Dharok
E6300 @ 3304mhz
8800GTX @ 630/1998/1504
XP 32Bit

Not the best GTX result , looks like my CPU is holding me back.

 

[gurusan]

Can anyone tell me how I can change the column names at the top in Excel? The ones that are labeled A, B, C...etc?

 

[Reggie]

30.725 fps
Reggie
Q6600 @ 3600mHz
3850pro 256mb @ 776/1026
Vista 64bit

 

[darren.head]

18.24fps
darren.head
E6400@3200mhz
x1900xt 512@stock 625/725
XP SP2 32 Bit

 

[rippling]

no TBH the results bearing in mind there at high and around the 30fps mark it isnt that bad at all, i think that its the motion blur when moving from side to side that makes it feel sluggish? and makes people feel sick! i think they over did the motion blurring!

 

[tomanders91]

[/IMG]

Not the best GTX result , looks like my CPU is holding me back.

Yeah thats not a very good result the cpu is more than capable.

 

[Rroff]

no TBH the results bearing in mind there at high and around the 30fps mark it isnt that bad at all, i think that its the motion blur when moving from side to side that makes it feel sluggish? and makes people feel sick! i think they over did the motion blurring!

The motion blurr is nasty with the framerate... but its not just that - the viewpoint lags around 500ms behind the mouse input - so if you stop moving the mouse it still carries on moving for a moment until it reaches where you want to be looking - if you've played a lot of quake 3 or similiar where the viewpoint and mouse input are in tight sync if feel very bad - like you are dragging dead weight...

 

[Duke]

42.03 fps
Duke
Q6600 G0 @ 3200MHz
8800GTX 768MB @ 576/900 (stock)
XP Pro 32bit

 

[ken1307]

51.195 fps
ken1307
E6400 @ 3200MHz
8800GTS 512MB @ 800/1000
XP 32bit

Assault_Harbor Timedemo

 

[perox]

The assault bench that comes with this software is a much better representation of how the actual game runs, we should have used that one.

 

[gurusan]

Assault bench with which software?

 

[perox]

With this bench program which we're all using.

 

[pumaz]

46.945 fps
pumaz
Q6600 G0 @ 2.40Ghz
G92 512MB 8800GTS @ 650/1950/1625 (169.21)
XP - 32 Bit

My rig is a new build and I've not had time to optimize, overclock or tweak anything yet. I am pleased with the way my GTS is stacking up against the GTX though

[URL=http://imageshack.us][/URL]

 

[gurusan]

With this bench program which we're all using.

I only see benchmark_gpu and benchmark_cpu

 

[perox]

Hmm I've got assualt_harbor aswell.

 

[gurusan]

Hmm I've got assualt_harbor aswell.

Must be because you have the full game.....

See, this way people can just use the demo as a benchmark as well

 

[perox]

Must be because you have the full game.....

See, this way people can just use the demo as a benchmark as well

Ah yea, never mind then.

 

[Cyanide]

I've managed to nudge mine up to 17.15fps average running at 2.5cpu and 680/700gpu but I can't get it stable any faster than that. Gonna open a window and try again in a bit

 

[gurusan]

I've managed to nudge mine up to 17.15fps average running at 2.5cpu and 680/700gpu but I can't get it stable any faster than that. Gonna open a window and try again in a bit

That's quite good as this game really doesn't do well at high settings on 7900s. Needs massive shader power