Soldato
Oh Dr_Fartypants don't be silly!
He's not being silly. I can't read it either. Not all of us have super human eye sight. I'd rather people continue posting like they have than make an ureadable image.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** OcUK Crysis DX9 TopList ***
- Thread starter gurusan
- Start date
He's not being silly. I can't read it either. Not all of us have super human eye sight. I'd rather people continue posting like they have than make an ureadable image.
Associate
Yea , thats the only reason i post full ss pictures , its so dam hard to read what is in the ss when someone takes a ss at 1900x1200 and resizes it to 800x600 .
Sorry I don't agree!
Image below taken from a 1920x1200 desktop and resized to 750 pixels wide!
Do you really find that hard to read ZoomZ? I think not.
All thats involved is a tiny bit of effort arranging the window and it makes it easier for people to read, whether they are on a laptop of using two IE windows side by side ay 1920x1200.
I'm just trying to help!
Sorry I don't agree!
Image below taken from a 1920x1200 desktop and resized to 750 pixels wide!
Do you really find that hard to read ZoomZ? I think not.
Don't think he meant that image. He meant the comparison shot earlier on.
Associate
may i direct you to the thread starter.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/member.php?u=52804
and if you check the posts with the scores in, you'll see the last edited time is before you submitted your score.
may i direct you to the thread starter.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/member.php?u=52804
and if you check the posts with the scores in, you'll see the last edited time is before you submitted your score.
Soz
updated
Associate
Im lovin the new 280's
2nd over all 1680x1050/VH , 1st 1680x1050/H and 1st 1680x1050/H/4x
2nd over all 1680x1050/VH , 1st 1680x1050/H and 1st 1680x1050/H/4x
Caporegime
They look fine.
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Jun 2008
- Posts
- 99
My old results from my old PC are miles back up this thread but here are the results of my newly arrived PC (before I start any Overclocking on it )
)
Soldato
Meep meep, new score:
*updated*
You are CPU bound, especially at that resolution. At 1680x1050 and higher resolutions your dual core AMD @ 3Ghz should be fine
. My old X2 was at 2.8Ghz and using 1600x1200 at the time was fine enough to let me see the full potential of the graphic cards I used in that machine.If you're wanting to get a higher 3dmark @ 1280x1024 you have one option. A CPU Upgrade which would mean motherboard and CPU.