OcUK Rolling Road 9: Photos + Graphs

All of powerstations wheel figures are low, can't remember the reason. But the figure is pretty much there to be ignored.

For example Moeks ST250 made 241 at fly, and 156 at wheels. That's front engined and FWD, should be minimal loss but loss of 85bhp going by their figures.
 
At the wheel is NOT correct at the wheel BHP because of the use of two contact points on the rollers, and the rollers squashing the tyres to grip them.
 
As usual, higher res available on demand yada yada

rr4.jpg


rr5.jpg


rr6.jpg


rr7.jpg


rr8.jpg


rr9.jpg


rr10.jpg


rr11.jpg


rr12.jpg


rr13.jpg


rr14.jpg


rr15.jpg


rr16.jpg


rr17.jpg


rr18.jpg


rr19.jpg


rr20.jpg
 
LOL at everyone trying to keep the 'Stang down :p

What mods has Moeks done to his ST?

I'm gonna have to turn up to one of these :)

Ohh and on the Pug pic, is Fox making sneaky love to his car? :p
 
At the wheels is different from at the flywheel..

Ok- Not criticising your car I was just curious. Now I understand that the manufacturers use power at the flywheel as their measure......didn't know that before. In that case it looks like both of the fives did well. Was the 1.8 a mk2.5 or has it been modded?
 
Ok- Not criticising your car I was just curious. Now I understand that the manufacturers use power at the flywheel as their measure......didn't know that before. In that case it looks like both of the fives did well. Was the 1.8 a mk2.5 or has it been modded?

Both were stock engine/exhaust-wise. :)
 
Dorje's doesn't have a stock exhaust, or at least it didn't sound it like did. That's if I'm not getting confused with DrDee's one
 
Back
Top Bottom