• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OCUK RTX4060TI review thread


Nvidia has a 65% profit margin apparently.
 

Nvidia has a 65% profit margin apparently.

Next quarter 70% and Apple is in the low 40% range.
 
As they say ship in ship out misquoted as before the watershed So far I've seen mentioned training on Reddit and Twitter data, I'm sure we'll get all sorts of pearls of wisdom from that :rolleyes:

That reminds me of something I watched about how/why certain words can cause chatGPT to get confused and spew gobbledygook. I'll see if I can find it.

Here we go: Glitch tokens

Whole thing is worth a watch, but from about 13 mins in they explain that it was eventually discovered that in the dataset used to generate word tokens there was some junk data from reddit and elsewhere, like debug logs etc, that made it in.
 
Last edited:
I own a 3060ti, largely because I was badly in need of an upgrade and managed to get one for a "good price" in the market at the time of purchase.

Which is to say I still felt a little ripped off, the 4060ti is a flat out insult.

Hard pass, I'm happy to wait a generation or two until the GPU world gains some sanity.

If I was buying now it'd be a 6700XT, after cashback they can be had for under £300.
The last couple years don't exactly fill me with confidence wrt that...
 
The 6700XT and 6950XT are a bargains compared to what the RDNA 3 and RTX 3000 and 4000 sells for. I'd never thought I would end up buying a new last gen product and even less that it would offer better price to performance value.. The market is "!#!" at the moment and the lower down the stack you go the worse it feels. The 4060ti is absolutely a garbage GPU and I really hope nvidia is punished for it. There is nothing preventing nvidia earning the big bucks on 4070ti/4080/4090 while still being the midrange champion offering sensible performance for sensible money in the 4060 catagory. Now you know why I absolutely despise Jensen as CEO and the rest of upper management responsible for this.

nvidia created covid to push profits!
:p
they spend all their r+d budget in something called the hive

Haha.. then again.. if Jensen could ... he would :P
 
Last edited:
It's not, it's just price wrong, very wrong.
I have to disagree with you on that. The memory configuration is not worthy of a x60 badge and I'm not even refering to the 8gb but the bandwidth issues due to a limited bus width. Then there is a lackluster PCIe config of only 8 lanes meaning any potentiel buyer better be rocking a PCIe 4 ready system so AM4 gen 2 chipsets and are is out of luck and the same for comparable intel platforms. It's the same move AMD made with the 6600 except its even worse now because the GPU core is clearly more powerful and therefor easier to bandwidth starve.
 
I have to disagree with you on that. The memory configuration is not worthy of a x60 badge and I'm not even refering to the 8gb but the bandwidth issues due to a limited bus width. Then there is a lackluster PCIe config of only 8 lanes meaning any potentiel buyer better be rocking a PCIe 4 ready system so AM4 gen 2 chipsets and are is out of luck and the same for comparable intel platforms. It's the same move AMD made with the 6600 except its even worse now because the GPU core is clearly more powerful and therefor easier to bandwidth starve.
Having those doesn't make a card garbage, it displays an image on your monitor and allows you to play 3D games, it doesn't constantly blue screen Windows, it doesn't catch fire or anything else like that. Having 8GB, being bandwidth limited, using 8 PCIe lanes doesn't make it garbage. It makes it a 'low end' card that should at least be $100-150 cheaper.

If all those things made a card garbage then you wouldn't have similar configuration cards and it wouldn't even be worth buying if it cost $50, that's obviously not the case.
 
Last edited:
How much difference could in increase in cache size have in future games and would rebar benefit from it too?
The increased cache allows the 40-series to read/write to the VRAM less often than the 30-series and scales across the line-up (the 4090 has 72mb vs. the 4060 Ti's 32mb) - its inclusion is one factor that allows the 4060 Ti to be competitive vs. the 3070 even though the architecture is massively cut-down in comparison (another factor being the 4060 Ti's 1GHz higher core clocks). It's not something that will be utilized any more in the future than it is now - it allows the 4060 Ti to reach the performance it's currently reaching - nothing more.

Unfortunately Rebar seems to be an afterthought for Nvidia - they added support when AMD announced SAM support on their cards/motherboards but on Nvidia it's based on a whitelist in the drivers that Nvidia rarely seems to bother updating these days (and any gains have generally been an absolutely maximum of around +5% performance but typically it's less).
 
Last edited:

Nvidia has a 65% profit margin apparently.

That's gross margin and it was 56% when I last checked. However, net margin is only about 16% which is the same as what they were making 12 years ago. If 16% is STILL all they make then the current prices are because it genuinely costs much more money to make a GPU.
 
That's gross margin and it was 56% when I last checked. However, net margin is only about 16% which is the same as what they were making 12 years ago. If 16% is STILL all they make then the current prices are because it genuinely costs much more money to make a GPU.

Their current Gross margins are close to 70% and will be 70% according to Nvidia next quarter.

If you are talking about the yearly net figures,it usually is between 25% to 35% net margins:

That is higher or on par with Apple:

Last reported quarter was almost 30% net margins which is around Apple level.

That 16% figure is for last year and Nvidia overproduced too much stock for crypto(probably):

Consumer dGPU sales are down and there was over $5 billion of built-up inventories. That most likely was factored into last years margins as a GAAP cost,which is hinted at late last year.

This has to do with a softening consumer market and too much inventory. It also affected BOTH AMD and Intel too because of unsold inventory. AMD did something similar last quarter too AFAIK.

PCMR has very short memories. In 2018,Nvidia overproduced too much Pascal dGPUs for the mining boom of 2017,so had similar inventory build-ups. So Turing was also released at a relatively high price.

8rBGHkF.png


Everytime dGPU sales have dipped a large amount and there is a large backlog of inventory,Nvidia has gone and released a sidegrade generation.

The question is,if the consumer dGPU sales slump continues will they refresh the range and drop margins a bit,or try and produce less dGPUs at a higher margin? We will find out in the next 6~9 months.
 
Last edited:
What's amd profit margin now? Given how they and their fan base keep banging on about chiplet design allowing them to make the gpus for dirt cheap, they must be making a killing?

Unfortunately Rebar seems to be an afterthought for Nvidia - they added support when AMD announced SAM support on their cards/motherboards but on Nvidia it's based on a whitelist in the drivers that Nvidia rarely seems to bother updating these days (and any gains have generally been an absolutely maximum of around +5% performance but typically it's less).

That's not quite as true now ever since nvidia released their fine wine driver for dx 12/rebar, which closed the gap significantly in titles like assassins creed valhalla (which many put down to being amds sam/rebar implementation....). Some games there is a huge boost e.g. dead space remake but yeah you have to manually go and enable it.


In my testing, the boost was huge:


Do agree it is an afterthought in terms of the whitelisting etc. however, it's probably for the best as it can cause some issues in games, hub even showed some issues on all amd hardware with rebar too.

Essentially rebar just remove the 256mb temp swap buffer to allow direct access for the cpu to vram.
 
Last edited:
If 16% is STILL all they make then the current prices are because it genuinely costs much more money to make a GPU.
The rainforest's net margin are something like 1%, does that mean it genuinely costs much more money to run a multinational technology company?

Or is it that they're using the profits from selling books to branch out into selling more than just books?
 
Back
Top Bottom