Caporegime
Just ran this with my new 3570k setup, 9547 overall, fair ol drop from my old 920 setup, 10092. Both cpu's at 4.2ghz, certainly shows the difference that ht can make, even on an older cpu.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**Official 3D Mark 11 scores**
- Thread starter Gregster
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 165
That Lightning under water? Impressive score - that I hope to beat at the weekend
Yes, these things love water!
Man of Honour
The i7 9XX cpus are still good performers. I don't plan on getting rid of my 2 anytime soon.
Just what I wanted to hear
it also gives me a base line to work to/from.Keep an eye on the lightning thread, I'm going to be trying to push the voltages a little higher over core and aux over the weekend
Caporegime
Yep, still have one, (930 based). Ill keep it for my encoding work. Two of them was a bit much though. And i fancied a new setup to tweak tbh.
Man of Honour
New score
GTX 590 quad sli
CPU i7 980EE @4.44ghz
Mem Corsair Dominator @2000mhz 7-8-7-20-1T
Score
P15556 3DMarks
Graphics Score
18368
Physics Score
11539
Combined Score
9569
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4436414
LOL overclocking the CPU from 3.7ghz to 4.44ghz gained me a reasonable increase on physics but on the graphics score I got an increase of 1 WHOLE POINT. No bottlenecking here.
Urm now how am I going to oc those GTX 590s.
GTX 590 quad sli
CPU i7 980EE @4.44ghz
Mem Corsair Dominator @2000mhz 7-8-7-20-1T
Score
P15556 3DMarks
Graphics Score
18368
Physics Score
11539
Combined Score
9569
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4436414
LOL overclocking the CPU from 3.7ghz to 4.44ghz gained me a reasonable increase on physics but on the graphics score I got an increase of 1 WHOLE POINT. No bottlenecking here.
Urm now how am I going to oc those GTX 590s.
lol ^^ nice boost on the Physics scores and surprisingly poor scaling on the 580's. I would have expected around 22k for the GFX scores.
Man of Honour
Soldato
Urm now how am I going to oc those GTX 590s.
You don't
Well you can a little bit, 590s were a bit hit and miss when it came to overclocking and the temperatures where not great... lol
Soldato
Im wondering if my scores are right, with an i7 2600k @ 4.7ghz, 580gtx Im getting about 7450, clocked at 850/2100 - but im seeing some scores with 580's on here, am I in the right ballpark, this is my day to day running setting, not a one time benchmark test.
Soldato
A gift from AMD.
Score
P11531 3DMarks
Graphics Score
11099
Physics Score
15403
Combined Score
10634
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4438937
beautiful drivers!
Score
P11531 3DMarks
Graphics Score
11099
Physics Score
15403
Combined Score
10634
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4438937
beautiful drivers!
Caporegime
Which drivers? The most recent ones i posted?
Soldato
Yes the beta drivers.
You have to take into consideration the CPU's and clocks the other 2 580's are using. What was your GFX score Mark? This will let you/us know if your 580 is performing 'as it should'.
Soldato
*shakes fist*
You just wait till my new RAM comes Locky
. I need to split that 3930K man sandwich at the top!!
You just wait till my new RAM comes Locky
. I need to split that 3930K man sandwich at the top!!
Soldato
Ill run it again later and take a wee look, thanks. Been out of the benching loop for some time!
Soldato
My GTX 580 clocks up to 975MHz on the core 3DMark 2011 stable, depending on drivers. 950MHz is easy but it is the Matrix Platinum after all.
Soldato
*shakes fist*
You just wait till my new RAM comes Locky
I have a 5ghz 3960k coming in the next few days, just waiting on a friend to sell it me.
Soldato
What's the performance bump in 3D Mark 11 like between that and a 3930K? Don't know the difference between the two and too lazy to search
.