**Official 3D Mark 11 scores**

[Gregster]

Score P17314

GFX Score 20676

Physics score 12281

Combined score 10789

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4377400

i7 2600k @ 5.1 Nvidia Geforce GTX 690

Nice score and what happened to the Lightning?

 

[Gregster]

Still got it! May keep it for my other machine, or move it on.

You have too much money

 

[Gregster]

You can never have too much money

May be worth giving the dual cards their own results table as more entries are being submitted! What do you think?

I have been thinking about putting the top 50 for each and putting the rest under spoiler. Any ideas guys?

 

[Gregster]

Virtu off, display how ever you want.

 

[Gregster]

I did run Virtu MVP with my 680 and according to AB, I was getting over 120fps consistently but it felt jerky as hell, so I did a couple of benches and then uninstalled it. Maybe I was on a Z68 board and it didn't like it (My scores did though) or maybe it is early stages and not quite up to speed yet.

Either way, my comp runs better with out it.

 

[Gregster]

Yeah, maybe it runs better with Z77, because it seems to help performance for me, without any issues I am aware of.

I had to do a hack to get it to work on my Z68 board and couldn't use the latest version (or could but CBA to do it). I can see a great potential in it though and a great boost to performance.

 

[Gregster]

It is a fault with 3Dmark11. You need to uninstall it and then do a run but it is upto you if you want to do that. It only takes a min to reinstall it after

 

[Gregster]

Ahh ok, I guess that's my only option :/

Sucks bud

 

[Gregster]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4396592

Score
P8236 3DMarks

Graphics Score
8282

Physics Score
8183

Combined Score
7987

EDIT: 7950 TF3 at 1000/1400 on stock voltage, Virtu MVP uninstalled. Overclocking done using MSI Afterburner.

Scores added bud Do you think your scores are a little low or is that just me?

Edit: Virtu MVP does add a massive boost to the scores and does it feel smooth whilst gaming?

 

[Gregster]

Hmm maybe, but I guess most people have overclocked theirs more than I have, since I haven't changed voltage from stock (993 mv).

Good point. Others have 1100 on the core that I was looking at. You still score the same on the GPU as my EVGA 680 does on stock though

 

[Gregster]

Plenty of guys here will help you if you are worried. Just don't go over 1.2V is my advice (on air). Take your time and back off if you start to see artifacts on the screen or any crashing.

 

[Gregster]

bye bye.

"Graphics driver not approved" refers to them not being WHQL drivers. Beta drivers will report this and people are welcome to post beta driver scores here.

 

[Gregster]

bye bye.

I don't think your stay here will be very long

 

[Gregster]

This isn't a popularity thread but it is a benchmark thread. You added a link to a score and asked if that score was "bending the rules"? I replied to your thread in a polite way but before I got chance, you had edited it to "bye bye"

 

[Gregster]

The members on here are very welcoming and helpful,
I don't know why you feel this way?

Why don't you post your score and see what happens ?

+1

Most of the time I dont comment but if I do I try to be very polite. Argue about vram though and it's a different story

 

[Gregster]

can you update for me plz

Done

 

[Gregster]

Hi guy's new to the forum just testing a crossfire set up her at the moment with 3DMARK11 the results look good to me? Well thanks for the really warm welcome and the advice as you can see i have removed the item that nobody likes and i shall keep you any longer best regards and goodbye.

bye bye.

The reason i asked the question is last time i was here which was my first and only time as a newbie i got such nasty "welcome" very much considered never to come back ever again. Then i said maybe that person is having a bad day etc, so i am willing to give this Forum "ONE LAST CHANCE TO PROVE ME WRONG". About the people on here so i thank you for taking note and wait to see what you say one and all? Sorry to hear that gregster i was hoping for a lot more?

P.S. Seems i was correct?

I very much understand this thread isn't about popularity, but the people on this web site could at least be some what more accommodating to new members. I would only be to happy to post you a score for you to comment on, but i feel there is no point now. So i will leave you to your thread and wish you the best of luck, because i can not see any point in being involved in something where your not welcome or wanted.

P.S. Cry me a river too.

regards ajay57.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4404980

ajay57, NO i am not Trolling just trying to get the people on here to remember what it's like when they where new and did not what to do?

And finaly...

They really need to look at the server on here always timing out?

6 posts and every one is rude. People here will help everyone who asks. I use a few forums but my first rule of thumb is to read the forum rules, so as to not break rules (or at least try not to). You are more than welcome to add your views offer advice or ask advice but chill out bud

BTW, I added your score

 

[Gregster]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4415293

P- 20000
GRAPHICS- 23044
PHYSICS- 16175
COMBINED- 12225

[email protected]
EVGA 680 FTW 4GB SLI
Using the newest drivers

Very nice score Scotty

 

[Gregster]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4417184

P11082
GFX 12594
Physics 8166
Combined 8125

Puts me top in the GFX scores

Edit:

New run
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4417266

P11124
GFX 12691
Physics 8128
Combined 8105

 

[Gregster]

very nice, I assume you guys are getting these updated scores from the new 306.23 driver?

Would OCUK give me a discount if I went for 4 x MSI lightnings

Oh bugger they won't fit in my case

Nice score gregster

Thanks guys. My next run put me 10th (not bad IMO with a 2500K still). I have no plans of changing the CPU though. These Lightnings are amazing

EVGA could be getting sold soon lol only joking....or am I? Meh!!!

My run was on the old 304.79 betas. They gave me more points than the latest WHQL drivers.