• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3D Mark 11 scores**

Have you tried the 301.42's? They are what I made my 670 benches with, I tried the 304.79's and all the others inbetween but none come close to them

I haven't and now I have my Rig all back together (Only did the single card test whilst I canged the TIM on my EVGA cooler), I probably won't. If someone beats my score I might though :p
 
Very nice score, :)
whats the temps like after the new tim?

Forget that, sell the Evga and buy a second Lightning :D

Thanks bud :) I would love to do that but cost wise, it just isn't viable. One thing I will say though, the Lightning is a seriously good card and yet is cheaper than a lot of the 680's.

It is deffo my new recommendation for a top end card. Temps re good on my EVGA now. A dust build up in the heatsink vents wasn't helping and new TIM has made a big difference.
 
Out of interest how much did they drop?

Also have you done a Heaven run with your Lightning?

Finally

Have you seen this-

Yer I did and I now have the fastest 680 in the scores :) I had read of nvidia being an arse over the voltages but didn't think it was to this extent. If you are buying a 680 get the lightning quick.
 
Im wondering if my scores are right, with an i7 2600k @ 4.7ghz, 580gtx Im getting about 7450, clocked at 850/2100 - but im seeing some scores with 580's on here, am I in the right ballpark, this is my day to day running setting, not a one time benchmark test.

You have to take into consideration the CPU's and clocks the other 2 580's are using. What was your GFX score Mark? This will let you/us know if your 580 is performing 'as it should'.
 
I did hear about the possible bottleneck from the 2500k chips with multi cards. What motherboard are you going to pair the chip with?

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-496-AS&groupid=701&catid=5&subcat=2174

This MOBO. Read some reviews and although it isn't the best for overclocking, it is still up there.

Yeah the bottleneck is definitely there. Usage in BF3 averaging low to mid 80's for me whereas with my Ivy chip it averages mid to high 90's. That's an unscientific observation though - didn't take any data.

Max 80% on both 680's or sometimes 85% but I am missing out and if I overclock on them, they just decrease. I did some research into Haswell and they are predicting a ~10% increase on Ivy so the 3930K will see me well for a while. It seems Haswell has less power usage so more inclined to benefit Laptops/Tablets.

Edit:

My findings were in MP.
 
Last edited:
The majority of asus boards on x79 are some of the best for overclocking, swiftly followed by the high end msi and giga boards. Get watercooling next, the 3930k deserves it :)

And as you said, haswell is geared towards the igpu side of things, I wouldn't expect to see it spanking the hex core I7's. IB-E looks an interesting one however, released after haswell with rumors circulating of 8 physical cores and keeping the 130w tdp.

I will be watercooling and hopefully doing both my GPU's also. Not sure when on the GPU's but as soon as I can get a Lightning block, it will be done. As for Haswell, I found myself reading what I wanted to read if I am honest ;)
 
^^ it is but you are in the wrong thread :D

I think there is something in hyperthreading and more cores. The pic in the link below I have shown before elsewhere but if you look at GPU usage its interesting. It shows my setup running BF3 single player the important bit is the CPU is only clocked @4.0

If I look at CPU usage in task manager its not even getting close to maxing out.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/29/membf3.jpg/

I have read that more than 4 cores isn't essential in games but maybe recent games are utilising >4 better. What made my mind up was FSX runs bad on my 2500K and regardless of 2 680's it is still poor so I am hoping this jump will help.
 
API = DirectX 11
Tessellation = Normal
Shaders = High
Anisotropy = 4x
Stereo 3D = disabled
Multi monitor = disabled
Anti-aliasing = 4x

Full screen = enabled (yes)
Resolution = 1680x1050 or 1920x1080
 
^^ added the score and very nice. Good temps, even when warm ambients :)

I have tidied all the scores up :) They look a little more proffesional now. It is a shame I couldn't add an Excel file for ease but no probs.
 
Back
Top Bottom