• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3DMark 'Fire Strike' Leaderboard**

yep my physics score drops as well, for some reason it stops the power limit i set it too though very odd, what driver you using?

in amd control panel if i set the power to 50% it change to 0 straight away when that setting in afterburner without power play support is selected
 
Last edited:
atomic7431 said:
yep my physics score drops as well, for some reason it stops the power limit i set it too though very odd, what driver you using?
Click to expand...

Put it back to "without powerplay", restart, apply your afterburner overclock, make sure the PWRlimit is @50% in afterburner, hit apply, then, CCC and set PWRlimit to 50% in there apply, i've found that when you apply an overclock in afterburner, it's resets the same thing in CCC, before running the benchmark make sure it's Set properly in CCC.

MjFrosty said:
Weird :S. Not that I'm complaining :D If you get to the bottom of it you'll smash my reference cards :D
Click to expand...

Your days are number Frosty!:D
 
atomic7431 said:
done quite a few more runs and since changing those settings the graphics score has dropped as you can see above, but the physics looks better.

i have restarted a few times yes, wonder if asus gpu tweak is hindering msi afterburner for some reason? but i get even better graphics score with asus gpu tweak.

pics on way
Click to expand...

Have you tried just using GPU Tweak?
 
Sorry to do this in the middle of your problem sorting. Tried 1207/1526 on 290 with disabled ULPS. Gained me a few 10's in score :) ( and 4 places on the leaderboard), to give me 10491. My CPU also seems to be doing well, considering. And I'm pretty sure this isn't the highest physics score. Maybe if the stars align one day, then I may break 10500+. :)

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1265722

I may have to keep posting these marginal increases (sorry Greg :P) as the faster I can launch 3dmark after booting, the better my scores are, at least that's my hypothesis.

EDIT: Updated score in my post later
 
Last edited:
atomic7431 said:
ok here is my newest attempt, cant get 1200 without artifacts.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1803029?



Click to expand...

Nice, unfortunately I am in the majority of sapphire 290's who can't unlock, but I can see it gives some increases. Do you ever change aux mV, and can someone explain to me what this should be set to? Also a tip, don't run AB whilst running this, I found it can take a few FPS, and therefore can affect the scores.
 
Sacrifice said:
Nice, unfortunately I am in the majority of sapphire 290's who can't unlock, but I can see it gives some increases. Do you ever change aux mV, and can someone explain to me what this should be set to? Also a tip, don't run AB whilst running this, I found it can take a few FPS, and therefore can affect the scores.
Click to expand...

I have never changed the aux mv no.
 
Does anyone know why I get a considerable less score on Icestorm and cloudgate and a lesser score on firestrike than jupiter_man?

Jupiter_man = http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1798260

Me = http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1801908

They are very similar spec systems although my CPU is better and has a bigger overclock but I still get less on graphics and physics, I'm very confused :(

Do my graphics scores look poor for my setup?
 
Tried something a little different. my 2600k @ 4400 this time, with my 290 at 1200/1576.

10602
Graphics Score 12534
Physics Score 11046
Combined Score 4785

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1275322

Not bad. I may be able to squeeze some more out of both my cpu and gpu though. I look at the leaderboard and think 'If only I did a little better'.
 
Last edited:
Footyslayer said:
Does anyone know why I get a considerable less score on Icestorm and cloudgate and a lesser score on firestrike than jupiter_man?

Jupiter_man = http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1798260

Me = http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1801908

They are very similar spec systems although my CPU is better and has a bigger overclock but I still get less on graphics and physics, I'm very confused :(

Do my graphics scores look poor for my setup?
Click to expand...

Your GFX scores are fine but your CPU scores are very low and very low for that clock of 4.5. I would expect at least 8k points for that clock. I would add a touch more voltage to the core, as something isn't quite right with that :)
 
Footyslayer said:
Does anyone know why I get a considerable less score on Icestorm and cloudgate and a lesser score on firestrike than jupiter_man?

Jupiter_man = http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1798260

Me = http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1801908

They are very similar spec systems although my CPU is better and has a bigger overclock but I still get less on graphics and physics, I'm very confused :(

Do my graphics scores look poor for my setup?
Click to expand...

Gregster said:
Your GFX scores are fine but your CPU scores are very low and very low for that clock of 4.5. I would expect at least 8k points for that clock. I would add a touch more voltage to the core, as something isn't quite right with that :)
Click to expand...

The graphics scores on Icestorm and cloudgate look considerably lower (I know this is a firestrike thread, just pointing it out)

I bought a bundle from overclockers, it was all pre-overclocked and was perfect. It seems now I am getting a lower physics score.

Recently went from windows 8 to 8.1, could it be that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom