-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**Official 3DMark 'Fire Strike' Leaderboard**
- Thread starter Gregster
- Start date
They scale very well actually
If you check out the graphic score of the Titans 8 Pack has just passed with the 290Xs, the Titans scored more than 1400 points more on graphics.
And Kingpin 780ti's are notably faster than Titans.
They scale very well actually
If you check out the graphic score of the Titans 8 Pack has just passed with the 290Xs, the Titans scored more than 1400 points more on graphics.
And Kingpin 780ti's are notably faster than Titans.
These 290xs are clocked to 1310... What are the titans clocked to? 1500? lol
The point is kepler does scale
Bring on the 780ti Kingpins please.
I don't think 290Xs are that good on LN2 but the Kingpins are.
The point is kepler does scale
Bring on the 780ti Kingpins please.
I don't think 290Xs are that good on LN2 but the Kingpins are.
My point is that Hawaii scales. But how can you expect them to keep up with 1500 titans (IF thats what they're clocked at)? lol
got some improved result http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2849336
Score 12244
Graphics: 14610
Physics: 11837
Combined: 5661
4770K@ 4.7 H110 cooler
290X lightning@ 1280/1715 factory air cooler
Score 12244
Graphics: 14610
Physics: 11837
Combined: 5661
4770K@ 4.7 H110 cooler
290X lightning@ 1280/1715 factory air cooler
According to my calculations that looks like a cracking (gpu) score for an air cooler, even more so with your cpu only at 4.6ghz and slow ram.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
Good graphics score.
Out of the 290 range the Lighting is the only one i'd consider buying.
Ram is @1866 just the 3DMarks system scanner not working too good
Ah not too bad then. I bet you can improve on it though with some tweaking. Great score though.
2nd place is a great result.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,876
- Location
- Surrey
Aye they seem to do the numbers
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,876
- Location
- Surrey
Breaking the chart with new overhead correcting drivers (337.50) and super tight ram timings
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2852434?
780Ti Ref Tri SLi 1250/3850
4960 @ 4.77
25251
Graphics Score 36812
Physics Score 17905
Combined Score 9217
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2852434?
780Ti Ref Tri SLi 1250/3850
4960 @ 4.77
25251
Graphics Score 36812
Physics Score 17905
Combined Score 9217
Breaking the chart with new overhead correcting drivers (337.50) and super tight ram timings
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2852434?
780Ti Ref Tri SLi 1250/3850
4960 @ 4.77
25251
Graphics Score 36812
Physics Score 17905
Combined Score 9217
now beat my dual card score
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,876
- Location
- Surrey
Stay out of it peasant. Why would I want to my rigs clearly faster 
I'll run it up again later
I'll run it up again later
Stay out of it peasant. Why would I want to my rigs clearly faster
I'll run it up again later
Oh sorry for interrupting sire, i will make sure to not involve my peasantry with your noble affairs. Forgive me.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,876
- Location
- Surrey
Not even close. Beaten Pinto though, whoever he is
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2852680?
1300/3900
4960 @ 4.77
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2852680?
1300/3900
4960 @ 4.77
Not even close. Beaten Pinto though, whoever he is
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2852680?
1300/3900
4960 @ 4.77
Oh i see