• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3DMark 'Fire Strike' Leaderboard**

~Dockie said:
I've just noticed gregster, i'm one spot too low on the overall scores, and so is BodgeITandRun and Ceryndrion.

in dual scores, Gareth170 is a spot too low aswell.
Click to expand...

Thanks for keeping and eye mate, much appreciated.

Updated Score here

SCORE 8202
Graphics Score 9008
Physics Score 14533
Combined Score 3530

7970 @ 1229/1707 and 1245 voltage
i7 990x at 4.29v
Aircooled

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/76254


Gonna push it some more. I wanna get near 8500 if I can.
 
Last edited:
X79 does kinda cripple Graphics scores it seems.

I do like this benchmark, it doesn't take very long to run! lol good for suicide runs.
 
Where's Gregster? Needs updating!

Actually... He's probably blown up his GTX680 trying to keep up with us 7970 guys :p
 
Scratch the last one(I had the wrong clocks down anyway-7970/50 CrossFireX@1150/1500(70)1125/1400(50):o).

I got a couple of points more this time putting the cpu to 4.7GHz and a +50Hz on the 70:

7970/50 CrossFireX@1150/1550(70)1125/1400(50)

[email protected] Corsair 100i.

SCORE
12165
Graphics Score 15587
Physics Score 12336
Combined Score 4561

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/105752?



LtMatt said:
Step aside Scotty, ass kicking tommy is in town. Nice score and gpu coolers you got there kid. :cool:
Click to expand...

For the money paid and it's 70/50 CrossFire, it's the first time Iv'e pushed them like this, the 50 is flat out, might get more on the 70 but suicide runs isn't my game so I'll call it a night mate.:D



Does feel like the 79's keep getting that little bit faster each driver release though, never expected it tbph.

Adding men into the driver team is paying off AMD, keep up the good work.
 
I have come to the conclusion that each of the Single 7970 scores have MVP enabled.

I get a Gfx score of 7500 and below without it and over 9000 with it.

The ONLY way everyone else is getting over 9000 is with MVP enabled :P
 
thefogo said:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/99504?
This seem about right?
Click to expand...
gregster said:
portal.gif
Click to expand...
Not sure what you're getting at :confused:
 
Rossi~ said:
X79 does kinda cripple Graphics scores it seems.

I do like this benchmark, it doesn't take very long to run! lol good for suicide runs.
Click to expand...

Im getting the same sort of numbers to you.

Is it X79 in combination with air cooling thats killing the graphics scores.

Even using 1325/7500 clocks I can not get near some of the guys using much lower clocks.
 
Diagro said:
I have come to the conclusion that each of the Single 7970 scores have MVP enabled.

I get a Gfx score of 7500 and below without it and over 9000 with it.

The ONLY way everyone else is getting over 9000 is with MVP enabled :P
Click to expand...

I doubt it, I will have a crack at single scores soon, I use x79 so no MVP here.
 
Locky said:
I doubt it, I will have a crack at single scores soon, I use x79 so no MVP here.
Click to expand...

Since I'm on a P67 I also have no MvP, however I must agree with Kaapstad that the x79 GFX scores don't add up. are people using different "Texture filtering quality" settings I raised this earlier but no one responded? Or could it be windows 8?
 
Nickolp1974 said:
No mvp here.
Click to expand...

Nickolp you on windows 7 or 8, also not pointing the finger but your sure you haven't got performance on via "texture filtering quality", since your post is so close to Rossi's - I couldn't help but notice that although you have the stronger memory clock, he has you beat on core, however your GFX smashes him, which tells me something is up via settings or the x79 has an issue somewhere?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom