• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3DMark 'Fire Strike' Leaderboard**

All scores done and awesome score Parabellum on those volts. Send me your card to give it the once over please? :p

My memory is bad and my last back up was on the 30th :D I thought I hadn't done it for a week or more.

Edit:

Nice score Besty and the fastest 7970 on OcUK's FireStrike bench :)
 
Last edited:
Not a cat in hells chance :D

But again good advice from you guys steering me in the right direction... really good community here with good people always on hand to help out ;)

So I need to upgrade my cpu now as im a few cores short :p the missus is not going to like it lol.

I am a big fan of EVGA in truth and can't recommend them enough. I wouldn't send me my card, let alone your card :D

As for the CPU, it isn't worth doing for benching and your CPU is capable of far more. LtMatt is the 2700K hero and hopefully he will give you some advice. :)
 
That must be read wrong by 3dmark, or he switched to a lower clock profile as soon as the bench ended to avoid a crash. I thought it was a requirement to list the clocks used anyway when you upload as 3dmark often reports incorrect data ive found. I think Ranger was up at 1300 core or something.

Yer probably. I looked through a few scores and clocks seem messed up.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1397489

That is the biggest problem. That card is top of the single card hall of fame in firestrike. :o
 
Well i don't think its too much of a problem here. You seen oc.net? Half of us would not even get in the top 100 over there. They allow tess disabling and other tweaks. :D

Yep. When I first started the 3DMark11 thread, it was done with trust but in reality, it would have levelled the playing field to allow tessellation modifications but I was a bit green then and I would still like to have the test done "As it was intended". The idea was to show your results and let people compare their systems to see if anything was wrong but it ended up as a hell for leather thread instead.

I know how to modify 3DMark11 to alter the LOD without FutureMark knowing but that isn't something I would ever do or contemplate doing, as cheating has never been in my nature and top marks to all the people who have posted results, as at no time have I ever thought that people were cheating.

The ridicule would be enough :D
 
Well i don't eve know if there is a way to glitch AMD results. According to the link i posted it detects everything but im sure theres a way somehow. It spoils the fun though, no point in cheating just to get higher on a forum leaderboard imo.

I have absolutely no idea but I believe it is Radeonpro that is needed. nVidia use nVidia Inspector to alter settings without getting caught or should say in allowed modifications :p
 
Yea i know it favors Nvidia, but why? What makes Nvidia cards run better on it?

nVidia can handle Tessellation far better than AMD because they have a tesselator on every SM, whereas AMD don't and they use a dual geometry engine on the top end cards. You would have thought they would haveimproved on that from the 6 series but they didn't. Maybe costs? Die size? Gawd knows.
 
I was running my Titan in games with the colder weather and fans were running very low (~400 rpm) and temps never went over 40c Prolonged would see them creep up of course but for a quick 30 minute game, that was it.

The 780 shouldn't run as hot a sa Titan either, so I can see temps being great this time of the year with a cooler room.
 
Back
Top Bottom