let the cpu bed in, give it a week.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***Official Intel Haswell Thread***
- Thread starter Yaayuh!
- Start date
let the cpu bed in, give it a week.
I have a similar temp difference. I just assumed it was the way these newer chips ran with various clocking down and voltage adjustments.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,522
- Location
- Dormanstown.
Running the RAM at 1066MHZ CL6 allows me 6.34.
I hate computers.
But then at 4.6GHZ it misses the target by miles, coming in at 7.71
I hate computers.
But then at 4.6GHZ it misses the target by miles, coming in at 7.71
Last edited:
I did 4 runs @ 4.6 and scored between 7.68 and 7.72.
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 9,287
- Location
- United Kingdom
Are you going for another Z87X-OC or something else?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,522
- Location
- Dormanstown.
Toms hardware says we should be at 8.X
They have a 2500K at 5GHZ at 7.71
Probably the Hero VI.
Toms hardware says we should be at 8.X
They have a 2500K at 5GHZ at 7.71
Ok i ran it at 4.6Ghz again with the cache/ring ratio at 45,i got 7.95.Thats with an unstable oc.
The ratio does make a difference as i got lower scores if i left it on auto (38).
Up to 10c difference is generally expected these days, however, any more and i would advise reseating the heatsink.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2010
- Posts
- 7,058
- Location
- Bedford
Is Broadwell still likely to be released or will we just see Haswell Refresh for the duration of this platfom ?
The two ib cpu's ive owned were the same. Current 3770k has one core 8c lower than the rest. Previous 3570k had one read as low as 12c at idle, rest in the low 30's.
I had a Q6600 @ 3.4/3.5 with one core running about 10c lower than the others ... after lapping the IHS the differences got a little smaller, but I never got them on the same level. Unlike another Q6600 @ 3.6 after that, which didn't have such a wild variance, and the 4770K now with practically the same temps for each core. As others have said already, it's somewhat "normal" to have temperature variances.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,522
- Location
- Dormanstown.
Nobody knows really, but given Intels Tick/Tock strategy, I'd be surprised to not see something that resembles Ivy from Sandy.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2010
- Posts
- 7,058
- Location
- Bedford
Going by this roadmap there doesn't seem to be desktop 14nm Broadwell shrink of Haswell. Instead there would be still 22nm 'Haswell Refresh' in late 2014/early 2015 followed by 14nm Skylake in 2015.
In the Anandtech forums there has been discussion that Broadwell would only come in BGA form factor now for ultra low/mobile parts
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2323134
Last edited:
It must make sense from a business persepective I guess. Lower power usage of 14nm is more beneficial for mobile and a selling point too, than desktop where a marginal IPC jump would be less likely to drive sales.
I read that they were delaying the outfitting of one of their 14nm fabs too, suspected to be to avoid over capacity, and I can see silvermont and mobile broadwell being given priority in such a case.
I read that they were delaying the outfitting of one of their 14nm fabs too, suspected to be to avoid over capacity, and I can see silvermont and mobile broadwell being given priority in such a case.
Lower max clocks is something we're just going to have to accept. Their focus is on lower power processes and applies to mobile and server. They wont go out of their way to ensure high clockability (arch or process) to an extent which just guarantees fast power guzzlers.
Hero and 4770K in the house
edit1 nice bios
edit2 I haven't booted an OS just doing the ASUS test at 1.2v
something appears amiss though, I am booting and running memtest at 5.2Ghz
Will push harder
UM! make that 5.4
Thought this had to be wrong turbo isn't being set before OS handoff, found setting in BIOS.
edit1 nice bios
edit2 I haven't booted an OS just doing the ASUS test at 1.2v
something appears amiss though, I am booting and running memtest at 5.2Ghz
Will push harder
UM! make that 5.4
Thought this had to be wrong turbo isn't being set before OS handoff, found setting in BIOS.
Last edited: