• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

****Official OcUK Fury X Review Thread****

So what is it really like with these cards? I've read some blabber on these forums about how the 390/390X are "vastly faster" than a 970, yet this supposedly flagship product is not that much more powerful than a 980 (to which an OC'd 970 comes pretty close)? Was it all just claptrap or am I missing something?

Sorry for asking stupid questions but I'm genuinely perplexed because I've seen reviews where the 970 edges out the 390x in quite a number of games:confused:
 
RavenXXX2 said:
AMD have ended up with egg on their face.

Here we are years after the 290 cards hit and with HBM, AMD hit us with a card that is slower than Nvidia's second tier GPU and with less memory.

Less fury and more furry kitten.
Click to expand...

Indeed the arrogance of them at that fury demo...amd are naff...:p

It's a joke tbh...a watercooler ain't enough...
 
Makes you (even more) concerned for Zen, now, doesn't it... Are AMD even capable of competing in any market these days?
 
ye^^;

im even scared to link tinytoms video
one of his big negatives was the card is too small 0_0
haha....made me laugh anyway
 
Greebo said:
They did though. I dont really think Nivida intended to release a 980ti at the price they did, just a month or two after releasing the titan x and the 980ti is quicker. They were forced to by the fury x.
Click to expand...

yes definitely, but AMD should have countered this by releasing the Fury X when there was no TX or Ti around to buy......the Fury X should have been in direct competition with the TX about 2 months ago..............what should have been released last week then ????............the Dual Card at only £800 :eek::eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom