Just finnished Tom's Hardware. TBH it look's better on there than the others. I think that's the only site that claims Fury is the equall of the 980ti.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
****Official OcUK Fury X Review Thread****
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
Just finnished Tom's Hardware. TBH it look's better on there than the others. I think that's the only site that claims Fury is the equall of the 980ti.
Yeah the 4GB is going to hurt it in some games at 4k more so with crossfire so it's not a viable alternative to the 6GB ti.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
Yeah that techpowerup review, looks great in that one, just don't understand it.
I wish my afternoon was like that. Unfortunately I bought my 980ti elsewhere in the morning, about 20minutes before OCUK put them all on sale.
My impatience has cost me a bag of haribo fangtastics
I don't trust his reviews, he's kown for using out of date drivers and results for cards from months a go.
If AMD hadn't made us believe this would beat the Ti, I wouldn't be disappointed.
Problem is that it's difficult to swallow the idea of a 4GB card which performs best at 4k.
980Ti is also a great overclocker...
I do think it's a step in the right direction, but they're still behind.
Problem is that it's difficult to swallow the idea of a 4GB card which performs best at 4k.
980Ti is also a great overclocker...
I do think it's a step in the right direction, but they're still behind.
Have some faith like I did.
My Fury Xs are on their way (thankyou OcUK).
Remember the Fury X packs 8.9 billion transistors on the core and once the drivers are sorted they will start punching their weight. The Titan X only packs 8.0 billion transistors, runs on air and uses old fashioned GDDR5, this is not over yet it is just the start.
Have some faith like I did.
My Fury Xs are on their way (thankyou OcUK).
Remember the Fury X packs 8.9 billion transistors on the core and once the drivers are sorted they will start punching their weight. The Titan X only packs 8.0 billion transistors, runs on air and uses old fashioned GDDR5, this is not over yet it is just the start.
Thanks now I can sleep like a dog tonight.
Yea NH said they had a few issues with their review and its all drivers atm.
while saying that AMD could have promoted the hype better than they did.
they really dosnt get their customer base and perception of this.
Look forward the 14 July for the next fury and then 29 july for win 10
Have some faith like I did.
My Fury Xs are on their way (thankyou OcUK).
Remember the Fury X packs 8.9 billion transistors on the core and once the drivers are sorted they will start punching their weight. The Titan X only packs 8.0 billion transistors, runs on air and uses old fashioned GDDR5, this is not over yet it is just the start.
PJS kicking in all ready.
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 9,258
- Location
- United Kingdom
Have some faith like I did.
My Fury Xs are on their way (thankyou OcUK).
Remember the Fury X packs 8.9 billion transistors on the core and once the drivers are sorted they will start punching their weight. The Titan X only packs 8.0 billion transistors, runs on air and uses old fashioned GDDR5, this is not over yet it is just the start.
We heard it hear first. Looking forward to seeing what you can do with them!
Have some faith like I did.
My Fury Xs are on their way (thankyou OcUK).
Remember the Fury X packs 8.9 billion transistors on the core and once the drivers are sorted they will start punching their weight. The Titan X only packs 8.0 billion transistors, runs on air and uses old fashioned GDDR5, this is not over yet it is just the start.
Doesn't really work that way kap, simple fact is if they don't have the card performing well at the launch reviews then thats all people are going to remember about it. Performance will increase with driver updates but that's no different from any card that's been launched from either camp in the past.
You were talking about first impressions a while back when you seen a fury x in a white oem box and how first impressions were so important. Well it applies here in spades because the performance isn't what people were expecting, and when its all said and done performance is what matters and it simply doesn't deliver enough.
Its like 2900xt, bulldozer and radeon 8500 all over again, looked great on paper but that's about it.
Have some faith like I did.
My Fury Xs are on their way (thankyou OcUK).
Remember the Fury X packs 8.9 billion transistors on the core and once the drivers are sorted they will start punching their weight. The Titan X only packs 8.0 billion transistors, runs on air and uses old fashioned GDDR5, this is not over yet it is just the start.
It can pack all the transistors it likes, if they are not efficient then it's game over as clearly seen.
LOL people have waited forever for these cards and they come out and people should wait even more.
AMD needs to get their stuff together. Pricing this where it is at makes no sense knowing they clearly need to win back the market
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 8,263
- Location
- Cornwall
Well I guess this sort of clears up the confusion about the Nano.
Is it about the same performance as a 290X or is it 80% the performance of the Fury X? Turns out that's about the same thing...
Is it about the same performance as a 290X or is it 80% the performance of the Fury X? Turns out that's about the same thing...
Associate
- Joined
- 27 May 2007
- Posts
- 1,346
- Location
- Kent