Soldato
AMD go home you're drunk.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Can't see anyone really buying one of these over even a 970 unless they were skint. Shame I was expecting a little more considering all the hype.
AMD go home you're drunk.
Can't see anyone really buying one of these over even a 970 unless they were skint. Shame I was expecting a little more considering all the hype.
AMD go home you're drunk.
The only fair model to compare the 970 and its "4"GB VRAM to is the 4GB model of the RX 480, which is currently £180. Only the most fanatical of Nvidia fanboys would try to claim that a 970, with its poor DX12 performance and lack of driver support going forwards, is the smart buy there, given that they seem to trade blows in terms of performance and only one is going to improve in the future. Even a 390 would be a better bet than the 970, but then it doesn't have the right company logo on the box.I don't see what all the hype is seriously? it's a £220 card that can't even match an GTX 970 and the 970 just loves to overclock and can be had for £207 with £20 cashback from EVGA
LMAO,so a £175 RX480 4GB does not exist??
even so you can get a 4GB 970 cough 3.5 card today for £200 so even at £175 it isn't a wow card, think about it nearly 2 years ago the 970 launched at £250-£275 we've waited 2 years for this a node shrink struggles to match the 970 and only cost £75-£100 less (at launch) as well as performance/watt is worse and it's on 14nm I know I'd rather have paid the extra £75-£100 2 years ago and have had a 970 than this junk of a card
The only fair model to compare the 970 and its "4"GB VRAM to is the 4GB model of the RX 480, which is currently £180. Only the most fanatical of Nvidia fanboys would try to claim that a 970, with its poor DX12 performance and lack of driver support going forwards, is the smart buy there, given that they seem to trade blows in terms of performance and only one is going to improve in the future. Even a 390 would be a better bet than the 970, but then it doesn't have the right company logo on the box.
Of course, the smartest option of all is to wait for the custom cards and see what they offer.
I wasn't expecting big numbers but we did get one - it uses almost as much power as 1080 during gaming. So much for all those efficiency claims.
Can't see anyone really buying one of these over even a 970 unless they were skint. Shame I was expecting a little more considering all the hype.
All nvidia have to do is drop the price of the 970 a tad more to kill this card stone dead apart from to the AMD Die Hards