Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That'd be a first.I am not insulting AMD
"I'm not insulting you, I'm just saying you suck and are worthless and dont know what you're doing".but why AMD you put effort even to make this 5XX series? It is called wasting your limited resources. 5XX should have not existed.
I am not insulting AMD but why AMD you put effort even to make this 5XX series? It is called wasting your limited resources. 5XX should have not existed.
The performance, however, would be poor and still nowhere near anything nVidia are offering atm.
I think the disappointment is that a year on, the performance-for-the-dollar hasn't improved.I think people have to remember that this is the most powerful card in the segment. Power consumption ain't everything. What the 580 does offer is better next Gen Api performance, more memory and Faster overall. I would hazard a guess that these factors are more important than using some extra juice.
No danger of AMD getting distracted from the mid range then.Companies can not just sell high end products, they do need good solid mid range ones too.
Personally I think AMD have done ok with the RX580. It is never going to top the benching charts but that is not the point, it is a good solid mid range card that comes with a nice performance improvement over the RX480.
Companies can not just sell high end products, they do need good solid mid range ones too.
I think the disappointment is that a year on, the performance-for-the-dollar hasn't improved.
When Nvidia refreshed the 680 as the 770, they at least reduced the price by $100 and moved it down a rung in the ladder.
A 580 doesn't offer anybody who was waiting to upgrade a compelling reason to do so anymore than the 480 did on release ten months ago.
I think the disappointment is that a year on, the performance-for-the-dollar hasn't improved.
When Nvidia refreshed the 680 as the 770, they at least reduced the price by $100 and moved it down a rung in the ladder.
A 580 doesn't offer anybody who was waiting to upgrade a compelling reason to do so anymore than the 480 did on release ten months ago.
I think the RX 480 and now the RX 580 are a symptom of AMD having little money for R&D, i think that is a real shame. BUT....
It looks to me the RX 480 is a beefed up die shrunk Tonga architecture, what was originally the 380X, but improved on colour compression and tessellation culling, Tonga was actually AMD's first architecture to have that.
Anyway, i hope AMD's reason for not really spending any money on new GPU's is the same reason they never realy spent any money on new CPU's in the last 5 years, in that they put everything into Ryzen, and it was worth it, lets hope Vega is getting all the money and it is the GPU equivalent of Ryzen.
Exactly.
AMD needs to get consumers to buy the cards, and unless they make them attractive over the already known 1060, that just ain't gonna happen.