• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**

Why is your Fury X score so low? I would have expected a lot higher.
Its 15% higher than a similar clocked 290X, fifteen percent. with 45% more Shaders and 60% more memory bandwidth

If you asked other Fury-X owners to post a result i suspect it will be the same, its not just this, Fury-X averages less than 20% better @ 1440P than a Hawaii XT in Games, something just isn't right with it.
 
Currently the lowest 980Ti, and proud!... Not really though.

5cYxmSa.png

3943 score, GTX 980Ti @ 1560MHz/2000MHz, 353.49 drivers.

i5-3450 @ 3.5GHz

I think my CPU is the problem here..

Edit: I'm a little confused. My GPU-Z reads 1560MHz core (+181MHz in Afterburner) but Valley reads 1725MHz?

Edit again: Decided to do 2160p, same speeds as above. Score: 1345.

iVRo1.png

This is CPU heavy, ignore the OSD in heaven, with Nvidia it reads the clocks wrong and with AMD it seems to think its hotter than the Sun, literally reads about a million degrees.

And well done on your 4K score, Kaap has just hung himself.
 
If that genuinely was the case, why would AMD launch it as it is?
It's got problems (None performance related), yet they launched, without stock, so it's not like delaying it would have hurt them.

Maybe it will get better, maybe it won't. But so far I'm completely disappointed in AMD's 2015 offerings. First time I've basically never gone for a launch since I've been an enthusiast.

Ask me again in 3 weeks, and i bet most of the stock has gone to China, the rest to Project Quantum and some leftovers to the US and EU.
 
Back
Top Bottom