Onlyfans to ban adult content

Anyone on OF and would have been effected by the "ban" who still stays there after this is a loon. OF have just shown everyone that their entire livelihood can disappear with 30 days notice if OF change their mind again so why would anyone trust them again?

Just like those who have a livelihood dependent on YouTube etc, the folks on OF will need to expand to other platforms to ensure they still have coverage just in case OF go rogue again!
 
Just like those who have a livelihood dependent on YouTube etc, the folks on OF will need to expand to other platforms to ensure they still have coverage just in case OF go rogue again!

I think a lot of people are lazy when it comes to expanding to other sites.

I remember when people had to build their own websites. These days they are getting all that hosting and site maintenance for free (or a small fee?), yet they still don't have a multiple platform presense.

I guess it could also be that these people aren't technically minded.
 
I think a lot of people are lazy when it comes to expanding to other sites.

I remember when people had to build their own websites. These days they are getting all that hosting and site maintenance for free (or a small fee?), yet they still don't have a multiple platform presense.

I guess it could also be that these people aren't technically minded.

Maybe it's a result of the way most such platforms tend to work, with the extent to which the platform promotes content being partially dependent on the number of views the creator's content has. In that situation, you get more promotion if you have all your views on one platform rather than being spread out over multiple platforms. Different risks.
 
I think a lot of people are lazy when it comes to expanding to other sites.

I remember when people had to build their own websites. These days they are getting all that hosting and site maintenance for free (or a small fee?), yet they still don't have a multiple platform presense.

I guess it could also be that these people aren't technically minded.

TBH, most of the successful people seem to be so adept at using social media and streaming services (all of them) to drive traffic to their OF accounts, I suspect that if they had to switch to an alternate OF-type service, they would have no trouble sending their subscribers there.
 
I think a lot of people are lazy when it comes to expanding to other sites.

I remember when people had to build their own websites. These days they are getting all that hosting and site maintenance for free (or a small fee?), yet they still don't have a multiple platform presense.

I guess it could also be that these people aren't technically minded.
It's time consuming and does require a lot of skills to move to multiple sites and deal with multiple sets of rules and formatting.

Most people aren't necessarily very technical, and running your own site securely and safely is quite hard especially if you're then dealing with things like payment services (which can be problematic, especially with content like you find on OF).

The main reason people go with something like OF is that it does much of the backend work for you as part of the service fee, leaving you the time to get on with producing the content and uploading it to a template that is easy and quick to use.

It's effectively the same reason most authors don't self publish, yes they could if they wanted, and would get a bigger share of the pie potentially, but at the same time they'd need to either employ an entire team of specialists themselves (copy editors, editors, page layout, artists, legal, marketing etc at hourly/day/single job rates), or learn to do it all themselves which would massively reduce the amount of time they could put into doing the ting they're actually good at.

Another reason people do it through the likes of OF is very simple, it provides them with a level of protection from the inevitable nuts as the initial contact can largely/entirely be done through the communications channels OF provide thus it's a bit harder to find someone's home address etc (something that applies to people in all sorts of public jobs these days).
 
i see Onlyfans has gone back on its decision to ban "Porn related content" due to user backlash..bet the ladies on there was terrified they might need to ACTUALLY work for a living!! :D
 
i see Onlyfans has gone back on its decision to ban "Porn related content" due to user backlash..bet the ladies on there was terrified they might need to ACTUALLY work for a living!! :D

Or OnlyFans worried they'd have no business left?
 
Or OnlyFans worried they'd have no business left?

The whole thing is very strange. Why an earth a website which makes most of its money from porn/erotica would then ban porn/erotica makes little sense. I wonder what the real reason was or who was telling them to do it.
 
The whole thing is very strange. Why an earth a website which makes most of its money from porn/erotica would then ban porn/erotica makes little sense. I wonder what the real reason was or who was telling them to do it.

I'd guess free publicity and negotiating better terms with banks etc
 
Anyone on OF and would have been effected by the "ban" who still stays there after this is a loon.

OF will still be the largest and de-facto "porn but not porn" site on the web so there is little benefit to moving to a lesser known service or even duplicating content to anywhere else. Even if OF goes south eventually, another company will be there to replace it so unless you know who that is, you have no solid backup anyway. You would probably still have to move over to the new big player in the sector.

Its not really much of a business either. You market yourself and you create videos and pictures which you should have copies of. There is very little buy in requirement and there is very little platform tie in as well. Thats why its so damn popular. Any 18 year old who isn't entirely unattractive can use their phone to part thirsty men from their money in a few minutes.
 
i see Onlyfans has gone back on its decision to ban "Porn related content" due to user backlash..bet the ladies on there was terrified they might need to ACTUALLY work for a living!! :D

Sex work is work.

You might not have the qualities or talent needed to do it but those of us that are fortunate and do still have to put in work, even if the work is mostly fun.
 
Sex work is work.

You might not have the qualities or talent needed to do it but those of us that are fortunate and do still have to put in work, even if the work is mostly fun.

I wouldn't define some over privileged and over rated using their body as a source of income as "Work".

A days work is when you Physically graft, Its not a proper job. Same with full time streamers just sit there playing games all day.

Agree to disagree.
 
I wouldn't define some over privileged and over rated using their body as a source of income as "Work".

A days work is when you Physically graft, Its not a proper job. Same with full time streamers just sit there playing games all day.

Agree to disagree.

So to you, work is only physical graft. So a Dr in a GP surgery who is discussing treatments with patients isn’t “work”? and not a “Proper job”. Lol.
 
I wouldn't define some over privileged and over rated using their body as a source of income as "Work".

A days work is when you Physically graft, Its not a proper job. Same with full time streamers just sit there playing games all day.

Agree to disagree.

If someone pays you to do it, and you can make a living at it, then pretty sure it counts as work.
 
I wouldn't define some over privileged and over rated using their body as a source of income as "Work".

A days work is when you Physically graft, Its not a proper job. Same with full time streamers just sit there playing games all day.

Agree to disagree.

I think you need to give your definition of work some serious thought...
 
Back
Top Bottom