The difference with Avatar is that the tech behind the visuals were pretty much the entire point of it existing at all, the movie was a tech demo first and a story second.Well just like a big deal was made out of the technology behind Avatar, it’s a similar thing. It was shot on 15perf 70mm which is a super rare thing. The best way to appreciate that is in an IMAX screen. Im not an IMAX lover but I’ve seen the film twice in a top-end screening room (digital projection) and once in IMAX and the difference in quality was massively noticeable.
It’s kind of ironic that a lot of people who humblebrag about home setups and spend hours and hours looking at home technology, projectors, speaker setups etc. will also willingly admit that they can’t actually tell the difference between a 70mm projection and a DCP projection. Or worse, don’t see the point
Anyway, we digress massively. See it on whatever you want. My attitude is that any movie experience is better at the cinema, especially something as good as Oppenheimer.
Similar fuss has been made about using this super rare 70mm IMAX film process but seemingly this isn't the sort of visual spectacle for many people to understand why such a fuss has been made about the film process used. My opinion is it's because that fuss was more about getting people through the door than this film actually being a particularly good showcase of why 70mm IMAX is so highly appreciated by those in the know.