• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OZONE 3D SOFT SHADOWS BENCH

gurusan said:
1gb single channel ram and only 2.8ghz is hindering my score a bit methinks

5 points off TOP 7900GT :p
Paracelsus said:
Ok, Scougar was right, it was running at 500/594, it seems the card doesn't recognise the benchmark as being 3D. Used ATITool to set the clocks to default 3D (621/900) and I got 3067.

ozonekc6.jpg


Got 3348 or something when upping core speed to 700, but it doesn't like being clocked any higher, and the memory won't budge at all.

Perfect example of how threads serve to help exchange knowledge aswell as create a bit of healthy competition. :)
---------------------
updated
 
all sorted

Here's a new score from me :)

Been tweakin' the last few nights...had some nice cold air here (card idles @ 26c-loaded never breaks 47c)..gonna go for pencil mem mod on GTS next. CPU gets cranky at 0c so....:(
Just scraped by the 6k barrier :D

6010ozone.jpg
 
Last edited:
willhub said:
Not a very good benchmark then is it eh? Shows driver performance and not Hardware performance.

No einstein, it shows HARDWARE performance is DRIVER related.

WoooooW, I've just realised something.....HARDWARE performance is directly related to DRIVER revision.

Did you even THINK about your response before you typed it?

Just like if you don't tweak your display driver your 3D MARK score will suffer. So stock runs of 3D MARK 06 don't really show hardware performance either since everyone could have they're HARDWARE rendering different levels of quality for example?

Oh well guys, no need to OC or bench anymore...nothing is set in stone so whats the point?
 
Back
Top Bottom