Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Dec 2006
- Posts
- 8,204
That doesn't sound right. Are you playing with the researcher right?
He may only receive a card for the city with which he is in. If you stuck around in Atlanta without moving you'll end up getting over run else where in the world.
https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/329595/researcher-card-not-game-breakingly-overpowered
That's what I said, you play with the researcher and it's too easy. You can usually only give a card to someone if you're both in the city of the card you're trying to trade. The researcher can take cards from anyone as long as you'll both on the same square. It's very easy to win by just having a researcher plus 1 or 2 other people all hang about atlanta because you're draw cards so quickly that you'll get the 5 you need. If you have a scientist, it's childs play.
In a 4 person game, that means 1 person can go and firefight any situations developing, but the way the game works, you won't lose before you have all the diseases cured with very minimal effort. Bare in mind, you need 8 outbreaks or to use all the cubes to lose. With this strategy, you can win long before that happens. We won the game both times only using about 1/4 to 1/3 of the deck.
Honestly, it's very simple to do and I would be surprised if any mathematically minded group didn't quickly realise it. The lose conditions simply take longer than it takes to draw the cards you need to win. It's a completely different game without the researcher and a much better one. It kinda took the edge off playing the game for us because we're very strategic people and can't ignore it when we play as the researcher.
Last edited: