Sometimes there are different categories of the same fund (A shares, B Shares, Z shares etc) - This is for retail clients, institutional etc.I thought I'd found the two I wanted to compare but the figures for 6m 1y and 5y don't match what are on the vanguard site.
Specifically Lifestrategy 100% and the FTSE Global All Cap Fund.
Yeah I think it was just the dates not matching. The fund ID matches so they're definitely the correct ones.Sometimes there are different categories of the same fund (A shares, B Shares, Z shares etc) - This is for retail clients, institutional etc.
You want the retail funds i'm guessing...??
Also dates don't always tie up to be exactly the same from the provider to trustnet etc - so you end up with differing numbers
Im with Vanguard at least for one pension. My current workplace is with Scottish Widow.Lucky you. My provider doesn't give me the option of Vanguard funds, so I can't pick the funds I really want. I can get close with one of them, but the 2 best funds available are a StateStreet global fund, and a seemingly unknown factor fund, although that has done particularly well for me in the last year or so.
State Street are big, 5th in world... they are half the size of vanguard, but vanguard is 2nd of the biggest.Lucky you. My provider doesn't give me the option of Vanguard funds, so I can't pick the funds I really want. I can get close with one of them, but the 2 best funds available are a StateStreet global fund, and a seemingly unknown factor fund, although that has done particularly well for me in the last year or so.
Size is irrelevant really, fees are what matter.State Street are big, 5th in world... they are half the size of vanguard, but vanguard is 2nd of the biggest.
List of asset management firms - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
scale of economy, the large the more they can keep the costs down. Large enough to move markets and size of asset under management should reflect on how secure the assest under management are.Size is irrelevant really, fees are what matter.
Market movers. All you want or need is a cheap index tracker.scale of economy, the large the more they can keep the costs down. Large enough to move markets and size of asset under management should reflect on how secure the assest under management are.
cheaper is not always better....
State Street are big, 5th in world... they are half the size of vanguard, but vanguard is 2nd of the biggest.
List of asset management firms - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
My personal thoughts on it, is that the more a person can place into their pension the more tax efficient they will be.. but IF they do get rid of NI; taxes will go up and I do suspect the basic tax percentage will go up before I retire even if they don't get rid of NI. It's better to pay the taxes now at 20% and put the cash into private investment than have to pay them at 22%, 25% or whatever percentage that they will raise to.
Agree with that, in that I think James Shack or Chris Bourne may have done a video that shows the different to income in retirement between saving into an ISA and paying the tax up front or saving into a pension and paying the tax at the end. The conclusion was that it was better to pay into a pension for the tax relief as getting £100 for ever £80 you put in (plus the higher rate if salary sacrifice or the tax refund if going via SIPP) makes it unbeatable. Think you need to have some in as ISA as well TBH but the majority should be in a pension, rules might change but it's easier to minimise tax via SIPP/ISA/GIA come pension age IMO.Been thinking about tax lately and my conclusion is there is no point getting hung up on it. Right now I earn c.30% more than I get paid because of tax, and if that's the same in retirement so be it. I think it's ultimately better to put more money in now (pre tax) so that more growth occurs in your pot, rather than limiting the growth to pay less tax in future.
Would be a massive vote loser and I assume they'd have to put some sort of protections in place for existing pensions.I wonder if they'd ever ditch/reduce the tax free lump sum?
Its a huge perk that I will absolutely make use of. But there must be some substantial tax to be grabbed there. Would it also keep people in work longer if it went?
Yeah I guess so. It would be one of those where all parties would have to agree I guess. Probably also impact many of the party themselves.Would be a massive vote loser and I assume they'd have to put some sort of protections in place for existing pensions.