Ive continued analysing my available funds.
Here are the top 10 funds in my scheme over the past 5 years:
Note that only the top 7 funds have achieved over 10% p.a average returns. Are claims of consistent above 10% returns therefore a bit overstated? Especially in a balanced portfolio - which none of the top 10 funds by themselves are.
Edit to add - when I looked at this in October 2020, 23 funds had achieved more than 10% growth over 5 years as an average. So performance this time is down compared to back then. Does this suggest equities are starting to struggle?
30% of my portfolio is in fund 9 on this list, which did well so that's good. But the other 70% is way down the list in a fund in 41st place, this is because that fund is mixed assets and also contains bonds/gilts as well as equities with a higher proportion of UK equities.
Question is though whether bonds/gilts will start to come good again, theory is they should if interest rates start to fall.
A video I watched last night said that all of the global funds are deriving their growth mainly from US equities, and even more than that, the US market is deriving most of its growth from just 7 big technology companies.
The top fund on that list is badged as an islamic fund (sharia compliant) but on inspection it still contains the same big 7 US companies as other equities funds do. So not sure why its done better and whether that will continue.
I did a risk ranking on myself and watched a few videos on it. Out of four categories 'cautious' 'balanced' 'growth' and 'adventurous' I landed between balanced and growth. The video then said to go up a category if you're investing for 11+ years like I still am in my pension scheme. So that would put me in the growth category.
So on this basis my investment choices might need to be more biased towards the higher risk categories than they currently are.