Someone should do the same to the artist and see how he likes it in the name of art.
for the win surely?
Someone should do the same to the artist and see how he likes it in the name of art.
I think this is a perfect example of art becasue it forces us to examine something that we would rather not. I find it disgusting, yet I think there is far more value in allowing it to happen again.
The first dog could have quite easily been saved by any of the visitors.
What is worse, the artist for doing it or the apathy of the visitors?
I'd put them on a par.
its seems a cruel act but some countries dont value animals the same way we do
But I think the artwork perfectly illustrates what it set out to do - the idea that people would rather have STRONG OPINIONS and do nothing, that people would rather have something that they dislike taken away by the authorities than examine just WHAT they're looking at...
Art.. what a load of crap.
lol, fantastic reactions in this thread rly. If only everyone thought like you guys eh!, there would be no starving animals, no homeless kittens etc. Fabulous!.
"In the name of Art"
A resounding euphemism for "Legitimising whatever I want"
cruelty to animals is a classic sign of a sociopath I think he should be locked up.
Art.. what a load of crap.