Soldato
/edit - I personally wouldn't touch RG58 at 1090MHz, it's terribly lossy.
Yeah I knew it wasn't absolutely ideal. But it seems to work plenty good enough for me. I will probably replace it when I move house eventually.
/edit - I personally wouldn't touch RG58 at 1090MHz, it's terribly lossy.
15m of RG58 has around 7dB of loss at 1090MHz, that's 80% of the received signal!
I have a standard answer to this.Can you recommend a cable?
I have a standard answer to this.
"The best you can afford".
Sorry, it's a bit of a glib answer. I'm a big fan of Messi & Paoloni coax and specifically Hyperflex 10 - With my rebuilt system and mounting the aerial on top of the Hexbeam, I've got just over 5m of Hyperflex 10 between the aerial and the receiver. It's not cheap at over £3/meter but you really do get what you pay for.
/edit - Grab the M&P catalogue and have a look at the different cables to see what loss you're happy with.
I've used Westflex 103 in the past and can recommend it.
Anyone wanting very low loss RF cables and connectors could do a lot worse that give these chaps a call:
https://www.wavelengthelectronics.co.uk/products/rf-and-microwave
Wallet warning : long cable runs with low loss aren’t cheap.
Yes, that's a good explanation and quite likely, thanks.Possibly had a tech issue after departure and wanted to stay nearby whilst it was resolved. Happens occasionally and that’s the sort of track you might expect to see if they were being vectored.
They were at FL370 for most of that but as soon as they buggered off towards Europe, they climbed up to FL410 and sped up quite a bit. I see what you mean though, I'd have expected them to be kept lower if they had an issue.However if that was the case it is more typical for them to level off rather than continue climb throughout.