PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS - Thread
- Thread starter shankly1985
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2015
- Posts
- 143
last two games in fp it is a lot easier than third person.especially for kills on euro server.its as easy as asia third person.
that's about the norm for afk killing....
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2011
- Posts
- 5,607
- Location
- UK
I don't do much apart from gaming lol, I'm still awful.
PC Gamer did an article on him a couple of months ago, I suppose when all the control you have over your body is your neck up then you make the best of it, still really impressive
Yeh i guess the graphics sort of suits the game, but i got games 5+ years old that looks 100 times better
thing is if they pumped the graphics up and with 100 players we would all moan about the performance.i think its a nice balance and look.it would be nice if the grass could be drawn more than 100m though.
Yeh i agree, rather have smooth play than great graphics, one day we will get bf1 graphics with 100 players and big maps.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,367
yeah i have no idea how he manages to play like that even with those specialist devices. however his game skill is far above average which makes up for his controls maybe not being as fluid as they can be.
there are guys out there that have completed destiny raids on consoles using nothing but a drumkit or gotten a sparrow through a full raid or killed a boss using nothing but specials, swords, etc. game skill being the key.
you could stick a pro cs player in front of a £40 monitor with a £5 mouse and they would still wreck is basically what i'm getting at. there are people that believe spending huge sums of money on peripherals gives you a massive edge but the truth is the difference is barely noticeable.
I don't think most people spend £800 on ultrawide monitors and high hz gsync monitors because they feel it will make them play better, it just provides a more immersive experience (ultrawide) or a smoother one (high hz + f/gsync). Hitting certain shots at higher hz is definitely easier though.
With mice it's just personal preference really and most gaming mice are £40+ now, some sensors measurably better or less faulty than others but I don't think anyone's buying them pretending it's going to make them a god.
With mice it's just personal preference really and most gaming mice are £40+ now, some sensors measurably better or less faulty than others but I don't think anyone's buying them pretending it's going to make them a god.
Last edited:
graphics obviouslly have a impact on performance.the main hit in the game is shadows.which is a 20 percent performance hit.
as for bf1 graphics i prefer them all on low.i like a clean look rather than post process vaseline look
Everything you add into a game has impact on performance, my point was the actual quality of the art work within that budget not post FX or shadows. I stated nothing to do with performance but the quality.
EA has a very high quality standard when it comes to production of the artwork. You can't slap anything into the unreal engine and turn everything on expecting it look like the top tier of games. But unreal does go a long way to making the worst bit of artwork looking somewhat good.
fpp is easier dont care what anyone says.nice kill amount though.
still stating opinion as fact I see
seriously now dude you are not even replying to what I am saying. I quoted the line 'FPP is easier don't care what anyone says' and said you are stating opinion as fact again. you reply by saying the players he was playing against were bad......I mean wtf?!
can I ask you a direct question without it seeming to be offensive, have you some form/type of learning disability? I'm not taking the pee or trolling just genuinely trying to get to the bottom of what's going on here. my apologies if you have, but it would explain some of your replies and would also help me temper my own responses in the future.