Tru said:I do. I realise that some think it's acceptable but it's the worst kind of spam in my book. Does my head in.
lol
Tru said:I do. I realise that some think it's acceptable but it's the worst kind of spam in my book. Does my head in.
Wow. That's a long hill to go down.Scuzi said:Bah, screw you all. I thought it might go downhill.
The question is, can you be bothered?Tru said:Yeah I notice it. I get frustrated if a thread has potential but people don't put the effort in, GD could be a lot better. It sometimes seems that, unless there's a moral or political point to argue, or some 'advice' to dish out, people just cant be bothered.
VeNT said:
Scythe said:The question is, can you be bothered?
Haly said:I wrote a long-ish reply to that thread, does that help?
To be honest, I try my best to write reasonable length replies because if nothing else I'm too idle to just type 'lol'There's no point in pressing reply in that case.
I don't often write very personal posts either but I did thereDaveyD said:I just added a reasonably detailed personal post, for me anyway, to add to the other, shorter answers![]()
I know you're not sure what I mean. But the question is, Am I sure what I mean?Tru said:What, me in particular? I'm not sure what you mean.
What are you, 12?Scythe said:I know you're not sure what I mean. But the question is, Am I sure what I mean?
Hmm?
Going off his profile, 14.Tru said:What are you, 12?
I see.Gilly said:Going off his profile, 14.
Do you see or Do I see?Tru said:I see.
Chronos-X said:The one that gets me is "can you back that up with statistics" for things that are generally 'known knowns'!