so you'd be happy with people on minimum wage (as the person who suggested this apparently is) paying more in taxes to support other people who have six figures worth of assets and could afford to pay for the cost of their care themselves?
this just gets funnier - people are coming up with rather odd ways to justify their opposition to this... partly simply because it was the Tories proposing it rather than Labour
No, I was responding to the poster who said £8 a month wouldnt do anything. Just pointing out it would raise 3 times more than the house selling idea. Perhaps the government should do both?
Anyway, after it was all carefully studied, the report's recommendation into the social care issue was insurance cover, perhaps that was £8 a month needed?
And I also pointed out that people will oppose an idea/approve of an idea purely based on which party proposed it whereas I believe ideas should be judged on their merit.