• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poor intel

Gerard said:
https://www.kitguru.net/tech-news/d...ain-claims-anti-competitive-business-tactics/

Crying about anti competitive tactics and a company trying to create a monopoly. Must be new to them being on the receiving end for a change.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

So Intel wants to licence IP they need to operate on the mobile market, Qualcomm owns the IP and have said "nope" so Intel have taken Qualcomm to court arguing Qualcomm refusing to licence their IP to Intel is not fair.

I have an idea Intel, get off your fat lazy ass and develop you're own technology.
 
humbug said:
So Intel wants to licence IP they need to operate on the mobile market, Qualcomm owns the IP and have said "nope" so Intel have taken Qualcomm to court arguing Qualcomm refusing to licence their IP to Intel is not fair.

I have an idea Intel, get off your fat lazy ass and develop you're own technology.
Click to expand...

LOL. Ahh Intel.
 
humbug said:
So Intel wants to licence IP they need to operate on the mobile market, Qualcomm owns the IP and have said "nope" so Intel have taken Qualcomm to court arguing Qualcomm refusing to licence their IP to Intel is not fair.

I have an idea Intel, get off your fat lazy ass and develop you're own technology.
Click to expand...

Yep. x86 licence comes to mind.
 
Intel dominated the market. Then ripped us all off with minimal ipc improvements and sharp price increases. They could have killed off anybody if they priced correctly and worked hard at performance boosts per generation. Get in AMD. Nice to have them back. Now "prepare to fight" . It's sad however AMD now price themselves to intels offerings in performance rather than just gone for the juggler and priced Intel out of the market. Good times or bad the cpu wars are back.
 
PiKe said:
Why does it? Intel license x64 from AMD and AMD license x86 from Intel...
Click to expand...

Because Intel fought tooth and nail the last 25 years to keep exclusivity of the x86 licence driving off the other companies like ibm, cyrix and via. AMD managed to survive because of the x64. Otherwise they could have been out also.
 
Doobedoo said:
Just watched that. Intel are really quite naughty and pretty much sums up why I have a preference towards AMD.
Click to expand...

That's an understatement! Your pets/kids might be quite naughty when they're not listening to you - Intel's systematic and brazen misuse of their position is something far for sinister. All in the name of market share, eh?

I can't say I have any massive antipathy towards Intel, but it's rather refreshing to see the shoe on the other foot.
 
Intel describes itself as “Qualcomm’s only remaining competitor” in the mobile chipset market, and that this is a move that directly quells that competition
Click to expand...
Lol I don't think so. That's like saying Tramere Rovers are competitor's with Liverpool FC.
 
fastwunz said:
is it the general consensus that a Ryzen alternative is the preference at the mo?
Click to expand...

That depends on your preferences, for gaming the 7700K is still king, but king by less than 10% and for £150 more than the Ryzen 1600.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom