• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poor intel

humbug

humbug

humbug

Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,819
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Gerard said:
https://www.kitguru.net/tech-news/d...ain-claims-anti-competitive-business-tactics/

Crying about anti competitive tactics and a company trying to create a monopoly. Must be new to them being on the receiving end for a change.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

So Intel wants to licence IP they need to operate on the mobile market, Qualcomm owns the IP and have said "nope" so Intel have taken Qualcomm to court arguing Qualcomm refusing to licence their IP to Intel is not fair.

I have an idea Intel, get off your fat lazy ass and develop you're own technology.
 

Panos

Panos

Panos

Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2009
Posts
13,252
Location
Under the hot sun.
humbug said:
So Intel wants to licence IP they need to operate on the mobile market, Qualcomm owns the IP and have said "nope" so Intel have taken Qualcomm to court arguing Qualcomm refusing to licence their IP to Intel is not fair.

I have an idea Intel, get off your fat lazy ass and develop you're own technology.
Click to expand...

Yep. x86 licence comes to mind.
 

wellibob

wellibob

wellibob

Soldato
Joined
27 Mar 2006
Posts
4,051
Intel dominated the market. Then ripped us all off with minimal ipc improvements and sharp price increases. They could have killed off anybody if they priced correctly and worked hard at performance boosts per generation. Get in AMD. Nice to have them back. Now "prepare to fight" . It's sad however AMD now price themselves to intels offerings in performance rather than just gone for the juggler and priced Intel out of the market. Good times or bad the cpu wars are back.
 

Panos

Panos

Panos

Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2009
Posts
13,252
Location
Under the hot sun.
PiKe said:
Why does it? Intel license x64 from AMD and AMD license x86 from Intel...
Click to expand...

Because Intel fought tooth and nail the last 25 years to keep exclusivity of the x86 licence driving off the other companies like ibm, cyrix and via. AMD managed to survive because of the x64. Otherwise they could have been out also.
 

Jay Psi

Jay Psi

Jay Psi

Associate
Joined
5 Oct 2007
Posts
216
Doobedoo said:
Just watched that. Intel are really quite naughty and pretty much sums up why I have a preference towards AMD.
Click to expand...

That's an understatement! Your pets/kids might be quite naughty when they're not listening to you - Intel's systematic and brazen misuse of their position is something far for sinister. All in the name of market share, eh?

I can't say I have any massive antipathy towards Intel, but it's rather refreshing to see the shoe on the other foot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom