• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
gerico said:
I think good on him Humbug. He must be sick to death of the retards messaging **** to him. I think I'd do the same in his position. Perhaps even for his own sanity blocking people is the best option. It's turned into a bit of a cesspit of late
Click to expand...

Someone else need a man hug? It is only a GPU and nothing worth calling people names for.
 
I'm not attacking a particular person Greg, and that word was not meant for you. I was generalising - perhaps not overly clear
 
http://wccftech.com/amd-officially-shows-fiji-gpu-computex-2015-4-gb-hbm-confirmed-radeon-fury-launches-16th-june/

at 4GB and ~980ti performance, it may be really good value premium <4K @60fpsxmany years lifetime gpu.
reason: Fury can not compete with 980ti 6GB in terms of perceived value and longevity so would have to be significantly cheaper.....doubly so if its hot and noisy in comparison.

Im betting that AMD will have invested very heavily in memory optimisation and compression technologies to justify the early jump to 4GB HBM in the face of larger GDDR5...so my guess is on some PR around this during release to try and persuade the punters that 4GB with super dooper compression technologies is enough...

AMD have to ensure that its convincingly keeping up/surpassing 980ti otherwise, the 980ti speed coupled with no need to water cool, +2GB Vram will push fury so far into 2nd place, its value will be decimated... i guess this is why AMD was said to be reworking temps/speeds..as there is too much at stake...

Decimation of price and a really good value premium low resolution card would be sweet for me as a 1080p gamer, as long as volumes are no louder. Especially if the performance bump is convincing enough over console gpu performance to give confidence in its longevity despite 16nm next year..
 
ginjaninja said:
http://wccftech.com/amd-officially-...hbm-confirmed-radeon-fury-launches-16th-june/

at 4GB and ~980ti performance, it may be really good value premium <4K @60fpsxmany years lifetime gpu.
reason: Fury can not compete with 980ti 6GB in terms of perceived value and longevity so would have to be significantly cheaper.....doubly so if its hot and noisy in comparison.

Im betting that AMD will have invested very heavily in memory optimisation and compression technologies to justify the early jump to 4GB HBM in the face of larger GDDR5...so my guess is on some PR around this during release to try and persuade the punters that 4GB with super dooper compression technologies is enough...

AMD have to ensure that its convincingly keeping up/surpassing 980ti otherwise, the 980ti speed coupled with no need to water cool, +2GB Vram will push fury so far into 2nd place, its value will be decimated... i guess this is why AMD was said to be reworking temps/speeds..as there is too much at stake...

Decimation of price and a really good value premium low resolution card would be sweet for me as a 1080p gamer, as long as volumes are no louder. Especially if the performance bump is convincing enough over console gpu performance to give confidence in its longevity despite 16nm next year..
Click to expand...

Que Orangy.
 
gerico said:
You seem like a bit of a ****. The guy is just doing his job, which is working for AMD so yes he is going to be backing the company paying his wages.
Click to expand...

gerico said:
I think good on him Humbug. He must be sick to death of the retards messaging **** to him. I think I'd do the same in his position. Perhaps even for his own sanity blocking people is the best option. It's turned into a bit of a cesspit of late
Click to expand...

gerico said:
I'm not attacking a particular person Greg, and that word was not meant for you. I was generalising - perhaps not overly clear
Click to expand...

Ok!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom