Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

[mururoa]

So the Nano is small... Great, I guess? But why would I need one / what does the size matter unless you are building a miniature ITX build? Render me unimpressed. $649 + tax for Fury X = 980Ti pricing.

 

[Frenzy]

Exactly my thoughts, why even post that here? Everyone seemingly agrees they nailed it, what exactly disappointed you? lol

I'm still skeptical. I'm waiting for proper reviews, maybe because I didn't hear the audio but I don't feel as hyped up as some of the others in this thread. Price sounds pretty good though.

 

[Orangey]

You could turn that around and say the usual AMD boys hyping things up. Actual gaming performance wasn't shown and people are writing off the TX and 980ti lol.

I know which one looks more stupid.

It's already been explained why there's no gaming benchies, but they'll be leaked or NDA will be up within a week so no prob.

 

[Mtom]

Seems fitting )

 

[Apache14]

If the Fury X performs on par with the 980Ti at stock clocks for £500-£550 at launch they really are on for a winner with that alone.


Also depending on the price the nano could well be the killer in this years AMD lineup, showing off the real advantage of HBM

 

[thebennyboy]

We are seeing the usual AMD fanboys wetting themselves at AMD PR.

1.5X the efficiency of the 290x is not that impressive at all, nor is 4GB VRAM, or the fact that it is less powerful than a TX .

But never let facts get in the way of a good masturbation.

Please stop posting crap. You seem very mad?

 

[fs123]

Really?

I am playing it now and get 60fps on Ultra with TressFX on my 295x2. I would think Titan X would get a lot more than 26fps on those settings...

TitanX SLI gets about 60-70 fps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkiHaVYvNio

Single TitanX gets about 43fps
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-x-gm200-maxwell,4091-4.html

If a single Fiji can hit 60fps as claimed by Lisa Su then AMD have nailed it.

 

[formby]

Very happy with the pricing of the FuryX thought it would be $150 more. Just need those 4k in game benchmarks though.

 

[Kaapstad]

yep, though if it were conclusively faster in a single GPU config than the Titan X then they'd probably have brought that up I'd have thought.

They would have had wall to wall benchmarks to highlight it.

Having said that $649.00 for the Fury X is quite a bargain and fantastic BFB.

 

[Joop]

Need benchmarks to see whats best!

I just want Betters lows than say Nvidia's line up and I would be happy!

 

[Gerard]

People are actually moaning about the measurement in performance per watt even though its exactly the same on nvidia presentations and when Tom Petersen is on the pcper podcast?

 

[Mayh3M]

I don't run dual GPU's. Had issues with every Nvidia driver since 350.12. There is no such thing as perfect drivers. Both camps have issues.

I go by best hardware. Now just need benchys.

Wow the hype has led to delusion!

 

[mmj_uk]

AMD have talked up HBM performance a lot but the fact of the matter is it's still only 120GB/s faster than 390X which has twice the amount of memory. NVidia's 384bit bus with their bandwidth saving gubbins might even be able to match it and they have 2GB extra. Lets wait for reviews before getting carried away eh?

 

[Ayahuasca]

It's already been explained why there's no gaming benchies, but they'll be leaked or NDA will be up within a week so no prob.

I know that, that's why it seems a bit silly to be writing off competitors cards based on what we've seen today.

 

[Brumboy]

$649 is the same price as the 980ti in America which translates into £540 here (EVGA Reference)

So it'll be £540, that's not exactly cheap though is it? It's still 980ti range. But then again nobody has any idea about the performance of it.

 

[Boomstick777]

So the Nano is small... Great, I guess? But why would I need one / what does the size matter unless you are building a miniature ITX build? Render me unimpressed. $649 + tax for Fury X = 980Ti pricing.

Talk about stating the obvious.

It's literally purposely deigned for small form factors, somehow you have written that as a negative

Other people with bigger cases could go Fury X. They are literally catering for everyone.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

I would imagine the X may have higher clocks but same everything else. But don't know yet.

Think it'll be lower specced (like 290 under X), being £100 cheaper.

 

[thebennyboy]

People are actually moaning about the measurement in performance per watt even though its exactly the same on nvidia presentations and when Tom Petersen is on the pcper podcast?

Nvidia peeps are just upset that their cards have just dropped in value.

 

[pmc25]

The exact same cards then, just ones watercooled, others air ?

I suspect they don't have any cores disabled. The X will just be binned higher and OC more, plus the cooler obviously - which will not be cheap at all if it's rated at 500W TDP ... the Gentle Typhoon fan's cost to AMD is probably ~$7-8 alone.

 

[TaKeN]

We are seeing the usual AMD fanboys wetting themselves at AMD PR.

1.5X the efficiency of the 290x is not that impressive at all, nor is 4GB VRAM, or the fact that it is less powerful than a TX .

But never let facts get in the way of a good masturbation.

You've been trolling this thread for days now, why not give it a rest?

AMD have shown progress and innovation today, we're discussing and celebrating that in here.

I look forward to seeing some benchmarks!