Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

[MOOGLEYS]

I like it because it is something different.......

 

[Lokken86]

TitanX SLI gets about 60-70 fps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkiHaVYvNio

If a single Fiji can hit 60fps then AMD have nailed it.

Little skeptical about that. We'll see.

 

[easyrider]

The futures bright the futures orange....I mean red !!!!

 

[Frenzy]

Just realised that guru3d link http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/nvidia_geforce_gtx_980_ti_review,17.html

doesn't have tressfx, guess that's the cause of the massive difference in frame rates I'm seeing in the benchmark thread?

 

[Boomstick777]

Wow the hype has led to delusion!

From you I agree.

Read:

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18675135

in all I counted nigh on 16 driver has stopped responding crashes while using chrome (HW ACC OFF) and one driver crash while playing Witcher 3 causing it to corrupt all my recent saves. The previous driver 347.88 and 350.12 have been perfect.

I can concur that I also have been hampered with the Display Driver Has Stopped Responding quite a few times since I installed the latest Nvidia Drivers last week.

Previously my 980 GTX has worked flawlessly along with the MSI Afterburner.

Think I'll be sticking with 350.12 until NVIDIA gets it's act together

last 2 drivers bad for me gone back to 347.88 until this is sorted

Same problems here. Lots of driver crashes on the last two sets of drivers. A couple times my pc has completely locked up and I've had to hard reset.

Tried the lot of them, had more black screens@stock in 3 weeks than I had on oc'ed 290X CrossFire, not to mention game freezing, TDR's are constant-never had any on AMD over 18 months.

Can't get DSR options in NCP either, guessing that's down to having AMD drivers on this SSD-suppose I have to drop this SSD in a bucket of acid and put in a new one to get DSR.

I'm back on 350.12 too, said it before and I'll say it again, if I could get AMD driver stability with Nvidia game profiles, I'd be one happy gamer.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

I suspect they don't have any cores disabled. The X will just be binned higher and OC more.

Can't wait for the full specs

 

[D.P.]

So the Nano is small... Great, I guess? But why would I need one / what does the size matter unless you are building a miniature ITX build? Render me unimpressed. $649 + tax for Fury X = 980Ti pricing.

Indeed, the Nano is interesting and cute, certainly great for mini ITX but for the average gamer makes no difference. the Fury X looks good but at the end of the day appears it will offer similar performance to the 980Ti, will come in at a similar price and have a similar efficiency, but only have 4Gb VRAM.

Good to have competition again though.

I think the TX owners can relax and realize all that groundless fanboy rumours about significantly better than TX performance has no basis in reality.

 

[Kaapstad]

$649 is the same price as the 980ti in America which translates into £540 here (EVGA Reference)

So it'll be £540, that's not exactly cheap though is it? It's still 980ti range. But then again nobody has any idea about the performance of it.

The difference is the Fury X comes with a AIO watercooler making the card very quiet and cool running.

If you want the same for the 980 Ti it costs extra.

 

[itchy]

The fury X at 8.6 Tflops that's faster than the titan X which is only 8Tflops.

Edit:

Just checked that is nearly twice as fast as GTX980 that's 4.6Tflops!

 

[Mayh3M]

Just realised that guru3d link http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/nvidia_geforce_gtx_980_ti_review,17.html

doesn't have tressfx, guess that's the cause of the massive difference in frame rates I'm seeing in the benchmark thread?

Yes

 

[David Bisset]

AMD have talked up HBM performance a lot but the fact of the matter is it's still only 120GB/s faster than 390X which has twice the amount of memory. NVidia's 384bit bus with their bandwidth saving gubbins might even be able to match it and they have 2GB extra. Lets wait for reviews before getting away eh?

I wasn't really paying attention but I'd assume they've got their own bandwidth saving gubbins like in the 285, which saves about as much as the nVidia alternative, so they should still be ahead in bandwidth terms, but we'll need to see benchmarks before we know how good it actually is or isn't!

 

[D.P.]

You've been trolling this thread for days now, why not give it a rest?

AMD have shown progress and innovation today, we're discussing and celebrating that in here.

I look forward to seeing some benchmarks!

I'm just putting the marketing PR in to perspective. If you think I am trolling then report me

 

[jimhaumman]

The new cards all run with AMD's high-bandwidth memory technology, which gives them comparable power to competing cards with more memory. For example, a HBM card with 4GB of VRAM would be roughly equivalent to a card running 6GB without the tech.

 

[Andygully]

Do i cancel my order for a gigabyte g1 970 for 1440p? £250?

 

[Protoype]

inb4 MSI Lightning Fury

^_^

 

[thebennyboy]

I'm just putting the marketing PR in to perspective. If you think I am trolling then report me

AMD did exactly what Nvidia did with regards to performance numbers... Didn't hear you complain about that so yes, you are trolling.

 

[flopper]

Fiji pro so good, ok 14 July cant wait.

 

[theor14]

If fury X doesn't need to go in my WC loop ill have 6x120mm of rad space just for my CPU XD can turn the fans off.

 

[mururoa]

The fury X at 8.6 Tflops that's faster than the titan X which is only 8Tflops.

Tflops are a bad indicator of real world (gaming) performance. See 290X vs. any recent Geforce for reference.

 

[d_brennen]

The really interesting stuff is where else they can shove HBM. APUs might actually get the attention they deserve