tbh I think something went wrong due to my fps being really low in all tests except for in nature where it’s ridiculously high. I usually get around 7500 with my 9800 pro so something weird happened. Although the score is nice. 
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3 results here
- Thread starter davetherave2
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 3,923
- Location
- London
13556 in 3DMark 03: compare link
I think I can probably go further as the card still runs pretty cool under load, hopefully I'll have time to play at the weekend.
Edit: Added a bigger fan, got 13765 here
I think I can probably go further as the card still runs pretty cool under load, hopefully I'll have time to play at the weekend.
Edit: Added a bigger fan, got 13765 here
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 41
im getting a 2001se score in the 9000 range.
this seems a bit low to me
xp-m 2500 @ 2449 mhz
512 MB RAM
***256 MB xfx xt 5700 le***
big coolers etc
what should i be expecting
i have tried several diff drivers from the net none seem to make a difference to my score
am i doing something wrong or do i just have a crap card?
this seems a bit low to me
xp-m 2500 @ 2449 mhz
512 MB RAM
***256 MB xfx xt 5700 le***
big coolers etc
what should i be expecting
i have tried several diff drivers from the net none seem to make a difference to my score
am i doing something wrong or do i just have a crap card?
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 May 2004
- Posts
- 4,669
I used to get 17332 with a 9800 xt and a p4 2.4
Originally posted by radio
3DMark 03 score - 10497
P4 3.0C @ 3.6
9800 Pro Flashed to XT (491/401)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2782391
For some reason it is showing the card as 9800 pro @ stock.
Dude your fps in mother nature are huge
Check out mine against yours (link in my sig). I beat you in everything (apart from sound, I use onboard) but mother nature you over double my GT clocked to Ultra. Thats just mad!
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 May 2004
- Posts
- 4,669
Thats gotta be a glitch cos I dont come any where near either ClickMeOriginally posted by no_1_dave
Dude your fps in mother nature are huge
Check out mine against yours (link in my sig). I beat you in everything (apart from sound, I use onboard) but mother nature you over double my GT clocked to Ultra. Thats just mad!
Originally posted by radio
3DMark 03 score - 10497
P4 3.0C @ 3.6
9800 Pro Flashed to XT (491/401)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2782391
For some reason it is showing the card as 9800 pro @ stock.
We cant accept this score as its obviously dodgy.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Feb 2004
- Posts
- 3,450
- Location
- Wiltshire
Just trying to squeeze every little last drop out of this card.
by the way *** r good temps?mine are = core: 76 and ambient= 40
not bad eh
by the way *** r good temps?mine are = core: 76 and ambient= 40
not bad eh
Last edited:
13107
http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=10
Still more to go. Will have another go tomorrow
http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=10
Still more to go. Will have another go tomorrow
3d mark 2001- 13372
3d mark 2003= embarassing
Athlon xp Tbred @ 2040mhz, 170Mhz fsb. Twinmoss pc3200 DDR. Chaintech ti4600 @ 320/710
3d mark 2003= embarassing
Athlon xp Tbred @ 2040mhz, 170Mhz fsb. Twinmoss pc3200 DDR. Chaintech ti4600 @ 320/710
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 2,636
- Location
- Wicklow, Ireland
13,804 so far...
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2003
- Posts
- 2,684
- Location
- England
i only get 21k in 3dmark2001se but 12214 in 03, whats going on. Does this meen new dx9 games run fine ? I hope so. Saving up 4 AMD 64, perhaps that make things better.
Last edited:
