• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3 results here

thanks

a64 3200 @ 9 x 261 = 2349
kingston pc 3000 5-2-2-2 213mhz
9800se softmodded 450/371with arctic cooling vga silencer
gigabyte k8n
tagan 480w psu
asetek waterchill

Im hopefully going to borrow a soldering iron and a multimeter from a friend so i can vmod my board. That should let me run 1:1.

Also trying to work out a way to improve my waterchill as temps will be a problem if i do the vcore mod.
 
Looking at the 3dmark03 scores - where are all the XT people at?

I get 6,600 with my rig totally at stock (XP3200 and 9800XT), surely some overclocked CPUs and 9800XTs should be scoring way higher than those listed.

Comeon guys...
 
Hmmm I ran up 16425 in 01, but it won't let me publish "due to detected CPU speed variation"???

So the highest verifiable one I can actually link to is 15836 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7683881

No problems with 03 though, which I've clocked up 5785 with http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2384065

Spec is:

Barton 2500 (superlocked) @2101MHz with FSB pushed to 190
PoerColor 9800se, softmodded and clocked - 387core 363mem
512Mb RAM
NF7-s

Can't seem to push the FSB further at the mo.

Considering risking the artic cooler to push th graphics that bit further.
 
Last edited:
Maybe worth having a go I suppose. I've just been using ATI tools artefact scanner so far, which I assume is a bit more picky than I would be.

Might go and have a bit of tinker :)
 
Originally posted by Norbert666
Looking at the 3dmark03 scores - where are all the XT people at?

I get 6,600 with my rig totally at stock (XP3200 and 9800XT), surely some overclocked CPUs and 9800XTs should be scoring way higher than those listed.

Comeon guys...
Click to expand...

lmao i can crank up 6300 with XT at stock and the 2800 @ 3200, how are you scoring so high??

My board isnt an overclocker but is meant to perform better at 200mhz than the likes of other boards.
 
Here is my 3DMark 2001 SE score: 19695

Will get a 3DMark 03 done soon

Got 6840 in 3DMark03 but can't upload it :mad:

XP2500 @ 11.5X218
1Gb PC3200 (CH-5) @ 218Mhz 11-3-3-2
Abit NF7-S V2
Radeon 9800Pro Flashed to XT, clocked to 430/367
 
Last edited:
Well my custom wc idea worked!!

3d.JPG


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7757366


a64 3200 @ 9 x 264 = 2379
kingston pc 3000 5-2-2-2 216mhz
9800se softmodded 454/371with arctic cooling vga silencer
gigabyte k8n
tagan 480w psu
asetek waterchill (radiator passively watercooled)
 
Last edited:
shez you need to add the compare link to the project not the project id otherwise you get an invalid project coming up. Please can you sort this out then you can be added to the table. for those of you not in the top 10 on either list once i get 50 people on the tables i will post the positions of everyone at that time.

It seems the top 10 for 3dmark2k3 hasn't changed much so i think i may have to overclock my system again and see if i can muscle someone out. :D :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom