Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3 results here

MadMatty · 15 Mar 2005 at 16:09

Is there a table online yet ? or did i miss it .

MoNkEyMiKeY · 15 Mar 2005 at 16:09

first page

wez130 · 15 Mar 2005 at 18:03

i just did mine, got 7687 but i don't know how to publish them

can someone tell me if it's good? specs below....

athlon [email protected]
XfX geforce 6600GT @ stock (only just installed it)
1gig Geil value RAM DDR400
DFI Lanparty NF2 ultra B

Indy500 · 15 Mar 2005 at 18:25

You should be getting nearer 9000 with that setup. Use the 71.22 or later drivers, turn AA\AF off in the nvidia control panel, and make sure there are as few services running in the background as possible.

wez130 · 15 Mar 2005 at 18:31

just ran it again and got 7705, using the 66.81's though, would that make a difference, the drivers i mean?

Shining · 15 Mar 2005 at 18:40

System as in spec below

At Stock

03 12309
05 6343

Overclocked - 250x10 (using overdrive4 CAT 5.3)

01 27153
03 13455
05 6343

wod_uk · 15 Mar 2005 at 19:12

3d mark 01 10968 using the below spec

MadMatty · 15 Mar 2005 at 22:56

MoNkEyMiKeY said:
first page

Well i'll be ...

Never even thaught to check opening page since thread is so looooong

Not overly happy thats its a top ten instead of listing everyone. The top ten is easy enough to find using the orb it self without need for special tables :|

Jokester · 15 Mar 2005 at 23:05

3dmark01:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8415995

3dmark03:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3678980

3dmark05:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=562715

Jokester

Duff-Man · 15 Mar 2005 at 23:17

Jokester said:
3dmark01:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8415995

I would have thought you'd get more than that... you have a faster CPU, and a graphics card more suited to running '01 than me. I can get almost to 35k, I'd have thought you'd be pushing 37 at least?

ricco · 15 Mar 2005 at 23:22

Duff-man thats nrly 3K difference then as he almost gets to 38K

Duff-Man · 15 Mar 2005 at 23:24

ricco said:
Duff-man thats nrly 3K difference then as he almost gets to 38K

Ooops!

I'm blind as a bat - I read it as 33k. All makes sense now. Move along - nothing to see here!

Nice scores Jokester.

ricco · 15 Mar 2005 at 23:28

Duff-Man said:
Ooops!

I'm blind as a bat - I read it as 33k. All makes sense now. Move along - nothing to see here!

Nice scores Jokester.

Thought you had, lay off the ice-pops

Jokester · 15 Mar 2005 at 23:29

Duff-Man said:
Ooops!

I'm blind as a bat - I read it as 33k. All makes sense now. Move along - nothing to see here!

Nice scores Jokester.

And there was me just away to point out it's the eighth highest benchmark result using WindowsXP (top score per user).

Jokester

nO}{8 · 16 Mar 2005 at 09:28

Jokester said:
3dmark01:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8415995

3dmark03:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3678980

3dmark05:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=562715

Jokester

wow! your scores are truly a sight to behold. Do you fancy one of them new fangled x850 xt pe's?

wez130 · 16 Mar 2005 at 15:24

i've just updated my nvidia drivers to 76.81's (i think) and got a score of 7753

, may try overclocking if the XfX 6600GT

sunlitsix · 16 Mar 2005 at 15:30

Jokester said:
3dmark01:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8415995

3dmark03:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3678980

3dmark05:- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=562715

Jokester

jees thats an x800 on n.o.s!

ricco · 16 Mar 2005 at 16:55

Surely we need the tables updated now

Jokester · 16 Mar 2005 at 17:52

nO}{8 said:
Do you fancy one of them new fangled x850 xt pe's?

Jokester

davetherave2 · 17 Mar 2005 at 02:42

ricco said:
Surely we need the tables updated now

Unfortunately the hard drive that I had the tables on has corrupted itself on me so I am currently trying to recover as much info from it as I can.

Why didn't I back it up. Silly me. Anyway once I hopefully recover the info the tables will be updated asap.