My lingering memory is her pledging to put an end to counter terrorism...My lingering memory of her is in that pre-referendum era as being ‘shady as ****’.
She has had to impose her will on a department known for its inability to change in order to get a bill prepared in time for brexit. A contentious bill no doubt, overturning 40 years of free movement between the UK and the rest of Europe. On the negative side she is a woman, not very physically imposing and she had to stand up to the home office mandarins and senior civil servants who i am sure were resistant to a few of her ideas. I am not surprised really if the language was robust at times and the required workload heavy. Some people were always bound to complain.
We really haven’t seen much of her over the past few months.
I find it a bit concerning that that Home Secretary has been entirely absent during a once-in-a-century global pandemic.
Then the one time she did make an appearance, she made a gaff worthy of Diane Abbot.
Why do we have to continue to put up with idiots like this in positions of power?
Maybe he meant he wanted it to be more Patel-able.Johnson asked for report to be more palatable. Did they print it on rice paper?![]()
Yep, it’s just more evidence that she’s not suitable for the job.So she get's rolled out, makes a complete dogs dinner of it and you're surprised they've not used her againWhile the faux empathy of Hancock is nauseating to watch at least he gives it a try. With Patel it's so clear that she actually doesn't give two hoots that she can't even pretend, much like her "apology", the words coming out of her mouth say one thing but you know she basically saying **** YOU !
Maybe he meant he wanted it to be more Patel-able.
Maybe he meant he wanted it to be more Patel-able.
My lingering memory of her is stating that executing innocent people would serve as a deterrent on Question Time.Oi, less of the P word, thank you!
My lingering memory is her pledging to put an end to counter terrorism...
My lingering memory of her is stating that executing innocent people would serve as a deterrent on Question Time.
Well doneMaybe he meant he wanted it to be more Patel-able.
Well done
Why do we have to continue to put up with idiots like this in positions of power?