Just a thought, is the base 15’’ Macbook faster than the iMac? Coming from PC I would’ve thought the iMac has more power due to you paying for portability? Still the case here? Or I’d it is faster, is that because the MacBook Pro has just had an update where as the iMac is waiting for one (and will be much faster when it has its update?)
'It depends'
I think either way in a single threaded workload the iMac will beat a MBP.
A heavily threaded workload could go either way, you are comparing 4 cores @ 3.6 or 6 cores @ 2.2, I would have thought the iMac would win out but I couldn't be certain.
The iMac has a far superior GPU to the MBP but the MPB will probably 'feel' faster due to having full SSD storage.
The base MBP is also £600 more expensive.
My concern about not running AV on my Mac stuff is passing along Windows based malware to others - I.e. no effect on my setup, but potentially damaging to others?
That wouldn't be an issue, how would it pass on to windows based machines without infecting the Mac? To pass it on your Mac would naturally need to be infected for the virus to be active.
I can honestly say I haven't been running additional AV for years, both Windows and Mac's baked in protection is fairly decent nowadays and updated regularly, nor do I stray outside of the trusted parts of the internet. Also the protections built into browsers like Chrome are reasonable. If you follow good practice, AV software is largely irreverent. Even if my machine was infected I could format, reinstall and download my data from the cloud in about 2.5 hours.
Home users are rarely targeted these days, much more money is to be made by targeting corporate entities. Outbreaks like wanacry only happen because big companies are running out of date vulnrable software (like Windows XP) and are incredibly slow to roll out fixes and updates. Hardly any home users were effected because of things like Windows 10 automatic update, it was patched long before the virus infected its first machine.