quake wars - minimum spec

couldnt of looked tbh all i done was type in google quake wars requirements and found this :)

Minimum System Requirements
Operating System: Windows 98/2000/ME/XP
Processor: Pentium PIII 800 MHz Processor or AMD Athlon
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 2™ or ATI Radeon™ 7000 or higher
CD-ROM: 4X or Faster
RAM: 256 MB RAM

Recommended System Requirements
Operating System: Windows XP
Processor: CPU Pentium 4 2.4GHz or Athlon64 3000
Video Card: Geforce FX 5700 or Radeon 9600 or higher
CD-ROM: CDRom 52x or DVD Rom 16x
RAM: 512 MB RAM
 
They said the requirements should be around what Quake 4 is, maybe a little higher. Apparently the E3 systems that it was shown on had the following specs:

At E3 the systems used to play the Enemy Territory Quake Wars had:

Processor: Intel Pentium D Processor 950 w/ Dual Core Technology 3.4GHz 800MHz FSB
Operating System: Genuine Microsoft Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 2
Power Supply: 650 Watt ATX 2.0 Power Supply with Active PFC
Motherboard: NVidia nForce4 SLI X16 Motherboard
Memory: 2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 2 x 1024MB
Video: NVIDIA 7800GTX 512MB
System Drive: High Performance - 160GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s 7,200 RPM w/ NCQ & 8MB Cache
Primary CD ROM/DVD ROM: 16x DVD-ROM Drive with Software DVD Decoder
Sound Card: Sound Blaster X-Fi High Definition 7.1 Audio with XRAM Technology
Network Connection: Integrated High Performance Gigabit Ethernet
 
Put it this way...from that spec a conroe and 8800 system will eat it no probs!Good developer...and its being designed for PC only...so performance should be good...if not excellent.

Maybe not long now...last thing I read it was to be released on June 7th! Cana wait for this one...hope its as good or beter than 2142.:D
 
Multiplayer Only...same sortoff gameplay as Enemy Territory and with specific roles etc. etc. It looks the dogs danglies off multiplayer games though!

It is teambased...and you will have to work with your team to complete the missions and beat the opposition...thats for defo!
 
Lysander said:
Errr is this going to be only multiplayer? Any co-op options?
Click to expand...

at the i30 presentation they said there will be bots available for co-op and the sort

and also as it runs on the doom3 engine aswell the game will be tailored to run on the same minimal hardware as quake 4
 
theo said:
at the i30 presentation they said there will be bots available for co-op and the sort

and also as it runs on the doom3 engine aswell the game will be tailored to run on the same minimal hardware as quake 4
Click to expand...

The Doom 3 engine?
Is the Quake 4 engine then based on the D3 engine :confused:
 
I can't wait for this! Will it have a storyline single player like Quake 4 or will it primarily be like UT or primary multiplayer?
 
Marky said:
I can't wait for this! Will it have a storyline single player like Quake 4 or will it primarily be like UT or primary multiplayer?
Click to expand...

As said it's multiplayer only mate, with the game play pretty much similar to the Wolfenstein - Enemy Territory which is free to download.
 
yeah its not demanding, i was watching a deveopler interview and they said they want as many people to play it as possible, offering great graphics for those who can, but also a lot of options to get it too run on low spec rigs.

Pretty sure they said the view distance is the whole map aswell, unlike battlefield 2.
 
steve258 said:
As said it's multiplayer only mate, with the game play pretty much similar to the Wolfenstein - Enemy Territory which is free to download.
Click to expand...

That's a little disappointing - but BF 2142 is pretty much the same and that rocks :p So I'm still looking forward ;)
 
Apparently this new fangled 'megatexture' thing that they're using makes it possible for people with mid-range systems to get a very playable game whilst looking damn nice too.
 
Why can't vanguard have a nice modern non resource hog engine like quake4? I think VG is going down the crapper as far as pop. no wonder, such a pointless PvP system.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom