• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Radeon RX 480 "Polaris" Launched at $199

I haven't really been following this closely, but is there any consensus on whether XFire RX480 (8GB) would be a better choice than a single 1080... at considerable saving also?

With the way CF and SLI are supported lately, I will say no.
 
Dating back to tahiti and pitcairn days yes, but since tonga 285 we've seen and being stingy and purposely giving apple priority whilst stagnating releases such as the rebranded bonaire and pitcairn released into 300 series with just cut down versions.

Example tonga 285 1792 shades, apple got the 2048 shader.
380. 1792, then eventually we saw the 380x 2048.

R7 360 is only 768 the full chip has 896
R7 370 is only 1024 the full chip is 1280 (China only).

There is no excuse for and to hold back the 480X considering they need to execute with outright precision these days.

Who is this And you speak of.
 
I haven't really been following this closely, but is there any consensus on whether XFire RX480 (8GB) would be a better choice than a single 1080... at considerable saving also?

If you want 8gb then you are only talking about a £100 saving. Personally id rather spend the extra and have the one single gpu solution (assumkng xfire 480's and the 1080 are similar in performance, which is what AMD have explicitly shown )
 
Been waiting for used 980 / ti prices to drop, think I'll probably just go with one of these if the price is as good as it seems.

Never thought I'd go back to AMD but this is tempting.


980 / ti prices are going to fall even more.

It will decimate new/used prices for 960/970 as well.
 
If you want 8gb then you are only talking about a £100 saving. Personally id rather spend the extra and have the one single gpu solution (assumkng xfire 480's and the 1080 are similar in performance, which is what AMD have explicitly shown )

That is something else which the 480 AotS benchmark was weird about. $500 for xfire 480 but they list the FE price for the 1080 when you can actually get them for $600.
 
That is something else which the 480 AotS benchmark was weird about. $500 for xfire 480 but they list the FE price for the 1080 when you can actually get them for $600.

Obviously they did. It is just an exceptionally biased comparison. To be expected ofcourse.
 
It just comes across as all smoke and mirrors. I just wish they had shown a single card in that game (Yes, even that game) and that would have been a teaser enough. What they have done is left people scratching their heads over this. Why was only 50% GPU utilization being seen? Is CF scaling bad? etc.

I like simple things and they should have just shown a single card run. That would have sufficed for now and BS to upsetting the reviewers.

Plenty of reasons - they are on beta drivers and need more tuning for Polaris - the game engine itself needs more tuning as devs are in direct control of mGPU - three - they are not going to drop all their ACES at once. I suspect they will be around 390X/980 performance when released and then get faster; towards nano speed after a little bit.

its going to be a hell of a card as 169-200 range....
 
That is something else which the 480 AotS benchmark was weird about. $500 for xfire 480 but they list the FE price for the 1080 when you can actually get them for $600.

they are competing with nvidia not AIBs :D, and Nvidia said that their Founder Edition is the Nvidia card, with their very own solution blablabla, makes sense :D
 
the 970 needs price cut of 100£ to get down to 159£ and compete against a faster 480 with 4Go and 165£
the 980 needs a price cut of 200£ to get to the 480 4Go.
can they even drop price that much without said cards owners backlash ?
i dont see the solution for them being 970/980, but the 1060 if it's not too far away, with the right perf/price, and even then the disparity between different segment will be weirdly high.

except 970/980 are EOL.......no more are being made....so you're not going to see those price cuts ever
 
Lol. Every previous generation says otherwise.

Just as an example, a month after the 900 series release...

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18629239&highlight=780ti

We also had 480's/580's for £200, 670's for £160. 680's for £220 etc.

those were push sells to get rid of stock - as not price cuts that they will sell normally;

You'll see 970 drop by 50 and 980 by 100......and the the slash sells to get rid of the very last of the stock - but your over all price drops no the cards don't drop in price like that.......we've seen cards actually rise in price after EOL - because they were still selling well.
 
except 970/980 are EOL.......no more are being made....so you're not going to see those price cuts ever

how the discussion went was, me guessing that nvidia could drop 1070/1080 prices as soon as july, depanding on how far the 1060 is, and price gap between these cards.
D.P suggested that they wont cut price on 1070/1080 so soon, and that the solution is on the 1060, and 970/980 price cut, so i posted that to show that the price cut needed from 970 and 980 was too high to be part of the solution, even if production stopped they cant just cut price by that much, to fight off the RX 480, and the 1060 remains the only viable solution i can see.
although the 1060 performance and price need to be very carefully set by Nvidia, time frame of the release need to be july, the stock need to be high etc.
 
That is something else which the 480 AotS benchmark was weird about. $500 for xfire 480 but they list the FE price for the 1080 when you can actually get them for $600.

To be fair you can only blame Nvidia for that. The "reference" 1080 is $699.

Who is to say that the AIB boards wont be cheaper than $250 each for the AMD?
 
Back
Top Bottom