• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Radeon VII

Interesting comments from Lisa's uncle Jensen Haung spoke to PC World, said Radeon VII is underwhelming and it will not have ray tracing and AI support.

https://www.pcworld.com/article/333...x-2080-will-crush-amds-underwhelming-gpu.html


Coming from the "it just works" guy who tried and failed miserably to put over ray tracing as the next big thing with over 90 minutes of him babbling on about it. Really what do you expect him to say? And if the card is indeed on par with 2080 then he's saying that card also has lousy performance.
 
.
AMD's Official TDP for the MI50 is 300W. This is the exact same card, minus a few features to stop it interfering with Mi50 sales, but a higher clock speed. It's not really speculation to say that the Vega 7 will be around the 300W mark too.
Tdp an actual are differnt, and we still don't have my real world data for mi50 ye on actual usage do we?
 
Just read that interview and reading the first paragraph and it sounds like they have no plans on turning DLSS on(at the moment?) "And IF we turn on DLSS we’ll crush it" so how come a "we will have DLSS" has now turned into a well maybe we will add it...
 
Just read that interview. Ugh what an arrogant horrible little man he is.

Not really he is doing his job by defending "his" products from the competition shareholders wouldn't be to happy if he bigged the Vega 7 card would they

That would be like tim cook saying the galaxy range of phones are brilliant

It would breed confidence in the shareholders and so on
 
Tdp an actual are differnt, and we still don't have my real world data for mi50 ye on actual usage do we?

TDP means different things to different companies. Like in cpu's TDP for AMD means maximum power draw at stock speeds whereas for Intel it means more real world expected power draw at stock speeds.

AMD gpus definitely pull more power than Nvidia's comparable models though I am not sure it's by as much as the TDP gap makes it seem.
 
Coming from the "it just works" guy who tried and failed miserably to put over ray tracing as the next big thing with over 90 minutes of him babbling on about it. Really what do you expect him to say? And if the card is indeed on par with 2080 then he's saying that card also has lousy performance.

His 2080 isn't the real 2080, there's one more higher tu104 held back , his point is more along the lines of Amd took Vega shrunk it down to 7nm and can only just about reach a die harvested (rtx2075) in non ray tracing game loads. If the nvidia cheatworks gets activated then yeah they could hurt Amd, just like maxwell did when Amd only had Hawaii.

Don't get me confused, turing is the biggest money grab I have ever seen. But it has also been a clever way for Amd and Nvidia to raise their pricing tiers.
 
Hmmm, NV 2080 vs Vega II. Personally I'd take the V2. Ray tracing holds no interest for me at all. ray tracing reminds me of my very first 3D card, a Diamond Edge 3D; it was too early tech and there weren't enough games supporting it to make it worthwhile. I returned that card for a Matrox 2D card whihc ran most games faster, until 3D matured a year or two later. So I'd rather take the similar speed, cheaper V2.

Having said that I'm not in the high end card market now (I bought a Vega 64 last year). but my son needs a mid range card soon.
 
Hmmm, NV 2080 vs Vega II. Personally I'd take the V2. Ray tracing holds no interest for me at all. ray tracing reminds me of my very first 3D card, a Diamond Edge 3D; it was too early tech and there weren't enough games supporting it to make it worthwhile. I returned that card for a Matrox 2D card whihc ran most games faster, until 3D matured a year or two later. So I'd rather take the similar speed, cheaper V2.

Having said that I'm not in the high end card market now (I bought a Vega 64 last year). but my son needs a mid range card soon.


Ray tracing will be interesting in a few years time if it takes off, right now its too much of a fps hit to be useful.
 
Ray tracing will be interesting in a few years time if it takes off, right now its too much of a fps hit to be useful.

I completely agree which renders the tech basically moot on the current generation of cards. By the time it comes mainstream the cards will not be able to offer enough performance to make them viable.

I have a 1080Ti right now and I imagine both the 2080 and VII would be too little boost to buy but I will wait on reviews.
 
Hmmm, NV 2080 vs Vega II. Personally I'd take the V2. Ray tracing holds no interest for me at all. ray tracing reminds me of my very first 3D card, a Diamond Edge 3D; it was too early tech and there weren't enough games supporting it to make it worthwhile. I returned that card for a Matrox 2D card whihc ran most games faster, until 3D matured a year or two later. So I'd rather take the similar speed, cheaper V2.

The problem is it's a similar performance, similar price card. That said, we need to wait for proper reviews. Luckily not long.

What this does confirm, though, is that Navi is mid range or heavily delayed. There's no way AMD will release another high end card this year. So chances are Navi is mid range (The AdoredTV leak suggested 2070 performance which fits).
 
And because it seems to have slipped under the radar for some reason, for a limited time (whatever that is) you get 3 games with the card.

rigSvTH.jpg

Not a bad package overall.
 
And because it seems to have slipped under the radar for some reason, for a limited time (whatever that is) you get 3 games with the card.

rigSvTH.jpg

Not a bad package overall.

What are you doing, non of these games have Nvidia tech in it, why would people be interested in it?
 
Back
Top Bottom